Clinton Judge Over-Rules Voter-ID | 59 comments (59 topical, 0 hidden)
Rights (none / 0)
You might be overthinking this, Hubble. I don't recall anyone making a serious attempt to create a new ID card exclusively for voting. I think KenTX is just asking that voters present currently available forms of proof of identity.

An ID requirement is not an infringement of your right to vote any more than an ID requirement is an infringement of your Second Amendment right to buy a gun.

by Twba on 12/26/2007 04:13:27 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Timely Article. (none / 0)
This article from today’s Washington Post does a good job of outlining the issue addressed in this thread. Within days, the Supreme Court will take up the issue of whether state laws requiring voters to present identification at the polls is a violation of the Constitution.

After the decision comes down, z1p101 will once again be proven wrong and KenTX will be proven correct. My track record at beating this clown is so consistently good, that I remain “supremely” confident.

Zippy's study of the Constitution is similar to how the apes studied the obelisk in 2001, A Space
Odyssey.
zippy and the constitution

He makes a lot of noise and bone rattling, but not much sense.
zippy discovers his first tool

by KenTX on 12/26/2007 09:57:59 AM EST

[ Parent ]

Clinton Judge Over-Rules Voter-ID | 59 comments (59 topical, 0 hidden)