Look at what you wrote:

"Cenk has his head so far up Obama's ass he can't think straight...He's pro Obama show he will only find arguments to fit his bias...TYT is like a radio, streaming version of DailyKos."

I mean fine, if that's your opinion, that's your opinion. But it's *my* opinion that you couldn't be more wrong.

He's said several times that Obama will not radically transform America and that an Obama presidency is not some kind of panacea.

He's said several times that Obama hasn't really shown much leadership while in the Senate, and that when it came to funding the war, Obama was no better. He makes a reasonable argument that Clinton has been in a much better position (due to her tenure, connections and name recognition) to really lead and challenge Bush but she hasn't.

Finally, to suggest that TYT is some super left wing outfit is just laughable (that's what I take from the DailyKos comment).  If you disagree with that statement, I'd like you to explain Cenk's positions on free trade/NAFTA and the presidencies of Reagan, Bush Sr and Bill Clinton (the guy who "reformed" welfare and pushed through NAFTA and the Telecom Act of 1996).