we could follow your example in regard to Democratic candidates and just make up anything we want about Paul.
For example we are just wondering how you justify these statements:
TYT: the Dems support the troops by supporting their defeat. The dems can't be trusted on any matters of national security Democrats hindering the war effort, funding, and the troops we'd have won these years ago. What we need is a much larger standing army, more media control, and fewer rules. Unfortunately Al Qaeda has learned to game our media in order to dispirit the American people and the dems just act an amplifier for their message.
TYT: the Dems support the troops by supporting their defeat. The dems can't be trusted on any matters of national security
Democrats hindering the war effort, funding, and the troops we'd have won these years ago. What we need is a much larger standing army, more media control, and fewer rules. Unfortunately Al Qaeda has learned to game our media in order to dispirit the American people and the dems just act an amplifier for their message.
Against this stement:
Ron Paul Forum: We need to gut the military to cut spending.
Please enlighten us how "gutting" the military is "supporting the troops" ?