I don't want to keep going around in circles here. You called Atilla's post accusatory, I don't see anything but neutrality. He even allows as how it seems quite likely that Cenk has changed his mind about the things he once wrote. He probably hopes so. I defend Atilla's right to ask about it. If it means Cenk has to keep answering the same question over and over - so sad! About something he wrote 10 whole years ago? Tender mercies! But he does sit behind that desk and ask us to listen to his views on a lot of topics, so I don't see why we're not allowed to check under the hood.