They happen naturally. As populations become more and more developed and the child becomes a financial strain as opposed to an extra worker in the family work force, birth rate drops.

In most of Europe and Japan with absolutely zero effort population growth has gone negative.  As China has developed, its population growth has declined.  India remains undeveloped and it will soon pass China.

The U.S. is an interesting case.  Due to the large number of people living in poverty and therefore having an undeveloped mentality our population growth remains positive but if you look at the wealthy, or even middle class, you see very little natural growth.

In short, the answer to population growth is development.  Unfortunately the more developed a country is, the more resources it uses per capita so its a double edged sword.

I'm sure that completely allayed your fear. 

by ProfRich on 04/06/2008 11:13:36 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I do agree that it happens naturally, but if we want to bring "everyone's" standard of living up, without having to sacrifice our own, or send the planet into code, it makes sense to me to at least try to speed up the process.  I guess I just don't see that limiting people to two children is that much of a sacrifice, but I do realize there is huge resistance to this type of interference in peoples' lives.  Then again, one would seem to want their children to at least inherit a livable planet.  I'm guessing that the buildup of toxics like flame retardants, DDE, etc. will eventually have more effects on human reproductive success.  oh yeah, but we can just grow them in test tubes.

by desertpear on 04/08/2008 11:59:44 PM EST

[ Parent ]