If you call my comments insensitive because of the timing of them, I can't argue with that. In fact, if one of Russert's colleagues, friends or family members participated in these discussions, I would have to apologize "if my remarks hurt anybody."  In a roomful of people who don't know Russert, it's fine. That's the shield of anonymity.  But this eruption by Tiggerporn is way out of control.  He is ascribing to me all sorts of conclusions and viewpoints that are totally made up and have nothing to do with my original comments.

David

by yturks on 06/17/2008 01:14:28 AM EST

By all accounts , outside of his work as a journalist ( agreed, debatable), Mr Russert was a genuinely nice guy. His death was unexpected, tragic even, and a grim reminder of our mortality.

So I'm thinking the reaction was had some aspects of "Wow, that could have been me " from his colleagues. Perhaps the deification as you put it comes from a subconscience desire to say nice things in a vain hope that the same courtesy would be returned if it happened to them.

Or it was a slow news cycle. Your choice . In any case he never impressed me as a particularly probing questioner either , not horribly vapid and ineffectual like Blitzer, but passable. However, he wasn't a complete asshole and he never let his success go to his head. That counts for something.

 

by MRFred on 06/17/2008 03:43:18 AM EST

[ Parent ]


Tim Russert was an indisputably good guy. But the mainstream media is going extinct.

Furthermore, Russert's vision was based on movement and he had a separate brain which controlled his hindquarters.  And he had useless, two-fingered forelimbs.  It's really no wonder he lost the evolutionary coin flip. 

by OneHitKill on 06/17/2008 12:48:34 PM EST

[ Parent ]

So thats where he ended up.

Hope the NYT has a better line than the Texans. 

by ProfRich on 06/17/2008 01:44:55 PM EST

[ Parent ]