That's what I'm asking you. Why is Edwards more appealing to you? He has views to the left of Obama, and he's a first class panderer.
Same question with Clinton. She's a smidge to the right of Obama, and she's also a panderer (along with every politician).
Again, what would make either of those tickets more appealing to you? You seem to hate all things liberal, so I guess I'm just not seeing it.
"If Obama wins will we still call it White House?"
"Swing State" with picture of noose
"Run Obama Run" from the KKK
Huh? Those were all from Obama supporters.
Maybe its not McCain supporters, they are pretty busy cheering for the terrorists these days.
Me, I am voting for the anti-terrorist candidate.
The McCain campaign is praying for a devestating terrorist attack because they think it may give Grampa Death a coupld of points in the polls.
We Obama folks would like to see the terrorist attempts to kill Americans shut down.
Its been in all the papers.
Because you'd rather vote for Edwards.
I notice in all of this, you still never managed to answer my question about what makes Edwards more appealing to you. You've made a dumbass joke about his hair and all that, but his ideas are essentially the same as Obama's. You're going to complain about race being injected into the debate, but can you tell me other than race, what's the big difference between the two? (Side note, you can't complain that others inject race into a debate when you just used Obama's middle name to imply that he would be soft on terror.)
I imagine here that you're going to say something about how Obama's supporters are soooo terrible and that that's what drove you away from him, but I'll remind you preemptively that A LOT of the people on this and other liberal forums (Kos, etc.) were originally Edwards supporters, and they didn't seem to drive you away from him.
The question remains...
"the 5-4 court decided to legislate from the bench in deciding what is "appropriate"&quo t;
I said you can argue all you want about whether this was C&U punishment but you can't call it legislating from the bench. It is in their purview, period. There is a big difference in arguing over functionality and arguing over where a line should be drawn.
Oh, and I suppose you want Rush shot on national TV for exploiting those little girl hookers he likes to frequent in the Carribbean? Or is it only American children who deserve protection?
Bobo says little boy rape=ok
little girl rape=death penalty
Draw your own conclusions there folks.
Also, you should rethink your opposition to the ruling outlawing the execution of retards. It could save your life.
:-)
