Bush blames Dems for high oil prices | 38 comments (38 topical, 0 hidden)
It all makes sense now (none / 0)
That explains all those terrorist attacks in red states and how the blue states have remained so untouched.

by ProfRich on 07/17/2008 01:51:25 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Read, dammit! (none / 0)

First, you might want to take a refresher course on the U.S. political system.

"Any U.S. state that will choose to vote for the white thug Bush as president..."

And you think that applies to the 2006 congressional election?

And, as always, your source has that quote being from Oct. 29, 2004.  Those Al-Qaeda guys were way out in front of those 2006 congressional elections, huh?

But we agree that you were full of shit when you said the GOP never tried to take Olberman off the air (Fox had a petition) and that the red states have been blissfully terrorist attack free since some crazy conservative blew up a building in Okie City, right?

 

by ProfRich on 07/17/2008 10:47:13 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Rest of us don't even know why you're not on FOX (none / 0)
in what coocoo world does your brain operate to think that rightwing religious nuts would consider gay loving, atheist tolerating Democrats their friends?????

not talking about friends, but more about who helped them the most when it comes to justify the terrorism they commit, built support amongst moderate muslims:

1. not following through well with the war in Afghanistan
2. not catching Bin Laden
3. invading a muslim country that didn't attack America
4. killing hundreds of thousands of mostly innocent muslims in Iraq
5. bombing houses of innocent muslims
6. torturing innocent muslims
...

all these things have made Bin Laden and his cause more popular and they are ALL on Bush's head, not even taking into account that 9/11 happened on Bush's watch

by callisto on 07/17/2008 07:13:22 PM EST

[ Parent ]
What am I, a bucket of truth? (none / 0)


You're so stupid that I don't even know why I bother explaining it to you.

I know why.  It's because you're a compulsive arguer with an under-developed sense of shame.

Imagine my surprise when my little self-promoting blog link led to an actual discussion of which states would side with Al Qaeda in the event of a three-way war between the Democratic Party, the GOP and "the terrorists."  Shiiiiit, Ray Bradbury couldn't come up with this stuff. 

by OneHitKill on 07/18/2008 07:48:32 PM EST

[ Parent ]
More clueless than MSM even? (none / 0)
are you really that thick? It can't be that bad can it? They even made the analysic on American MSM.

Al Qaeda knows statements like that would help Bush get reelected and they wanted to keep Bush in charge, his Iraq War has only helped Al Qaeda, especially since he won't engage them seriously in Afghanistan (please don't confuse the Taliban and Al Qaeda now)

If an American President would stop all the money wasting in Iraq and direct real military force upon Afghanistan and seriously invest in human intelligence, Al Qaeda could be rooted out AND Bin Laden would be caught

only one who would likely do this is a Democratic President, so no Bin Laden will do anything to keep Repugs in charge, they've proofed they can't catch him and keep making the wrong choices

by callisto on 07/17/2008 07:03:20 PM EST

[ Parent ]

Bush blames Dems for high oil prices | 38 comments (38 topical, 0 hidden)