Legal for churches to abuse kids | 26 comments (26 topical, 0 hidden)
its about legality vs. sympathy (none / 0)

a slut that wears revealing dresses, keeps unsavory company, cock-teases, and then gets "rape"d gets no sympathy from me, even if i agree that she has legally been raped and her assailants need to be punished as dictated by the law.

legality is not the same as sympathy. 

i am making this distinction. i don't really care about the legality of this decision (esp. since i don't know all the facts of the case, and since i am not sufficiently bothered to find them out). i am nonetheless amused and entertained by what has happened because i think abuse at the hands of religion is well-deserved (even if it may be illegal).

by neo on 07/30/2008 07:10:09 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Dude, come on (none / 0)
Are you TRYING to play the villian here?



by Tom Hanc on 07/30/2008 07:18:33 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Play? (none / 0)
I'm certain he and a lot of people think that way, of course foregoing all the implications that holds... like blowback.
Blowback, something conservatives have a hard time accepting, since in their world view they are the ultimate authority on what's right and wrong. Can you imagine me going around punching every conservative in his face for the nasty things they say? That would be unjustified blowback in my view, but hey since we're playing by different rules: punch away :)

I think those people have a basic lack of understanding of civil societies in general.

by callisto on 07/30/2008 08:48:19 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Here is where you became retarded. (none / 0)
a slut that wears revealing dresses, keeps unsavory company, cock-teases, and then gets "rape"d gets no sympathy from me,

RAPE IS NEVER OKAY.

She was never "asking for it."

"No" does not mean "yes."

I pray you are somehow permanently barred from contact with women.

by jarett on 07/30/2008 11:16:20 PM EST

[ Parent ]

Legal for churches to abuse kids | 26 comments (26 topical, 0 hidden)