I hear you. But if his posts are just left without comments, will that help or hurt? At a site with a lot of commenters, he could be easily ignored. But when there are so few forum posts and commenters, there might be the danger of people assuming that his ideas are accepted and supported if nobody argues against them. I'm interested in what people think about that hypothesis.
I sometimes try to draw Ken into real discussion, but it does seem useless--he is a mouthpiece for the Republican party and Big Oil and doesn't seem to have many interests apart from amassing capital and dismissing anyone who doesn't have money at the top of their personal value system.
I don't bother reading any of his linked nonsense, but the responses have provided me with good material to fight republican talking points.