It's all so complex and yet it can be summed up in one sentence:  We consume way too much fossil energy, we waste half of it, we cannot possibly produce enough here to satisfy the demand, and no current government leader is seriously trying to change our energy bad habits.  To assign blame we have to point all ten fingers at all points of the compass, reserving at least one for ourselves.

by bfaul on 08/20/2008 09:56:38 AM EST

The WASTE is a good place to start.  Conservation is the cheapest source of energy and doesn't even have to be painful.  Look at the way our current food system is, with people eating things from halfway across the planet that have to be flown and shipped and trucked.  What we have is unsustainable, so even if we drill or develop new energy sources, we have to look at changing some of the ways we have done things when oil was cheap.

by desertpear on 08/20/2008 01:57:06 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Exactly, but conservation is an issue of personal responsibility, that is why the R's belittled it.  They don't believe in any form of accountability or responsibility.  Not for Scooter, not for the DoJ, and especially not for those in the big gas hogs--  BUY MORE!

by NicoloM on 08/20/2008 02:24:37 PM EST

[ Parent ]

Early on in the Bush administration Ari Fleisher was completely honest about what they were going to do to encourage Americans to change their lifestyle to reduce our dependency on fossil fuels: 

"Asked whether the president was considering a campaign urging Americans to change their lifestyles and conserve gasoline, Fleischer replied: "That's a big no. The president believes that it's an American way of life, and that it should be the goal of policymakers to protect the American way of life. The American way of life is a blessed one."

The statement above more than any other explains why gas prices are so high today.  They've made no effort of any kind to reduce usage, not one single useful thing.  It's been given no priority at all.  These people have failed to anticipate every single crisis they've ever had to deal with, no matter how much warning they were given.

If you parse that statement carefully, what you realize is that it is an argument in favor of selfishness.  It says that the American people are selfish, that selfishness is an American way of life, that it ought to be, and that this administration applauds the fact that it is, and promises never to ask them to change.  They've lived up to that promise.  What it doesn't do is provide a plan for the pigs to follow when the trough is finally empty.  That would be "hard work", something this president never likes to contemplate.

by bfaul on 08/20/2008 02:29:54 PM EST

[ Parent ]

I was around for the first "gas crisis."  Only change is that the people in the oil business are even more filthy rich enough to buy politicians outright, both democrats and republicans.

by desertpear on 08/21/2008 02:32:28 AM EST

[ Parent ]