bruck is not talking about adding to the national debt, he's talking about moving the economy.  Whenever families have to clothes their children and go to the shops and stores in droves, it drives the economy -- no matter how they got the money.

I've been a renter all my life, but I can appreciate you paying for your own home.  I hope that's not the only reason you want the government to bail out the mortgage holders rather than the lenders.

If America (the current admin) can give trillions to the Iraqi homeowner, I should think you'd be in favor of "giving a helping hand" to fellow Americans who lost their jobs through no fault of their own. 

If the government blows up the homes of some of the best American workers who lost their jobs through no fault of their own; and builds them new ones to replace; give then a warning first and blow them up.   I know this is silly, but the Iraq expedition proves it works.

 

by Lennilenape on 09/16/2008 05:15:33 PM EST

[ Parent ]
We haven't payed for what's happened in Iraq.  We borrowed the money we've spent there.  Don't you get it?  You're playing word games.  The government is running a deficit.  Any nickel it spends bailing anyone out is borrowed.  It all adds to the debt.  This can't go on forever.  Huge loans are being made that will never be paid back.  What do you think is going to happen to these people you're talking about if the dollar collapses?  Never mind them, what do you think will happen to you?

by bfaul on 09/17/2008 01:22:03 AM EST

[ Parent ]