1. Thank you for your constructive criticism. *cough

2. I agree with you that my statement that Mr. McCain's education is not given any evidential support. It was however, just a statement of belief. A statement of belief that I do not understand how any person would not seek to educate themselves after the experience of the public scrutiny associated with a Senate ethics investigation.  Especially when that investigation is regarding conflicts of interest he has interfering with federal regulators that are reviewing an organization whose owner is a constituent, and campaign contributor, as well as someone who has direct financial investment ties to his wife. I would have the faith that Mr. McCain, or anyone in that situation, would subsequently do a little bit of research as to what makes this wonderful economy tick, and what makes it go tick-tick-tick-boom.

3. I would suggest that you reread my original post. I think you missed the point (like by a mile!).

4.  I currently am not affiliated with any party. So one of your assertions is wrong.

5. I like your last line there. I think you should sign all your posts that way. It's an indication of the level of depth and seriousness you are willing to apply when reading a post. Keep being reactionary, it's exactly what this country needs.

"Objectivity lies not in balance, but in truth. And truth is more often than not unbalanced - slanted in favor of right, and against wrong." -Ed