When dressed as a Firefighter, anyone would fully understand that a person whose home is on fire would therefore expect you - because of your firefighter costume, AND their current emergency circumstances- to BE THE FIREFIGHTER you are pretending to be.
The FAULT falls on the person identifying YOU for the mistaken identity and/ or misinterpretation of your outfit. Its THEIR FAULT in this particular situation.
Why?
1. Firefighters have a very distinct easily recognizable outfit.
The above situation is the jist of your argument.
I will also add the following
2. The person doing the identification is in a moment of emergency and crisis and does not have the time to stop and think whether or not you may be in a costume pretending to be something that you are not.
Now let us apply this same argument to women.
A woman is wearing an outfit that you and the majority of people agree would be deemed to be "sexy". This is the equivilent in your argument to your "firefighter outfit".
As a result of this woman wearing this "outfit", when a man looks at this woman he finds her attractive and thus he DOES WHAT?
I hope I do not have to spell this out for you....
1.?
2.?
3.?
In your arguement the man's actions based on what clothes the woman is wearing are the woman's fault (firefighter)....NOT the man's fault (person with burning house), even tho it is the man(person w/the burning house) who is the one that is actually doing the performing/speaking/doing/ etc.... the action in question. Which is in your firefighter example the WRONG action.
The fault in the examples gets moved from the one taking the action in the first example of the firefighter, to the one who does not take any action in the second example - woman wearing clothes.
THe point is as Invert has said many times, and others here have tried to help clarify and btw this message has been said about the Taliban, and the Mullahs in Iran, and anywhere else in the world that women are forced to cover themselves because of the supposed lack of ability of men to be able to concentrate in temple or mosque, or in the street, that men cannot control thier urges if they are exposed to women at all in any way so women must be kept a home and never allowed out of the walled in compound, or if they are allowed out they are tobe covered head to toe so as to not provide a distraction to the men. TO the MEN.
Assuming that its OK for any man to treat any woman in the ways you are describing for any reason - least of which being her clothes is as if you think that men stop growing emotionally from when they were 12 yr old boys finding thyour eir first National Geographic or their father's playboy. AND that THAT IS QUITE OK... It is not. And we have all seen what that kind of attitude toward woman can do to a culture and to people.
Firefighter outfit or t-shirt and jeans - if you want to be treated with respect - earn it first by understanding that both the firefighter and the woman are both the mis-seen person in the examples, and it is the ones who make the observation of the firefighter and the woman who are the ones in the wrong and must change.
by
sbandb on
01/26/2009 09:19:01 PM EST
[
Parent ]