First off, I never once stated that it was appropriate for a man to proposition a woman because she's wearing a low cut top or something like that.  That's a ridiculous mis-characterization of my argument, and it may be due to me not fully understanding your point.  I was referring to a dialogue between Ana and Cenk from a few shows back.  I'm not sure what your point is because you attempt to draw an analogy for me to "get it" and in the process you dismiss your own insight as you state:

If this is the standard for negotiating the tricky road of gender variation then by what right do you have an informed opinion on what women think/feel as you are by your own definition unqualified to hold one.  Additionally, if what you say is true then it must logically be true that women have no clue what it is like to be a man as evidence from your own words, "The world as a (man)woman experiences it is far different from your own.  And until you're willing to accept that, this won't go anywhere."  So by your own admission women don't know what it's like to be a man who's incapable of controlling his wandering eyes. This argument cancels both party's complaints out and is foolish in general, but this is what you get when you present a specious argument.

 Now on to reality.  I understand that people dress for comfort and I can buy into the top-tier fashion lines are more comfortable argument even though I am skeptical.  What I don't buy into is my cleavage being out is more comfortable than not, or wearing a mini-skirt in the dead of winter is more comfortable than pants.  You can't pass this off to me as reality because adherents are either liars or fall so far off the scale of common human experience to be not worth considering i.e. outliers.  It's clearly about style not comfort and once again we are back to style being about self-expression and this by definition requires at least one additional person to appreciate your flair.  So ultimately, if you are expressing yourself you will be oogled so expect it.  You also may be judged as well though not by me.  It seems to be a common human trait to judge self-expression and apply a value judgment to something as one does when they browse an art gallery.  I'm not comparing people to art, but there is something about fashion that is reminiscent of art, or arguably should be considered art.  When your exhibit highlights an area that evokes sexual stimulus in males you get oogled.

Finally, It's necessary for me to say I'm not blaming women for the abuse they take from men that go way over the top and enter the land of harassment or abuse.  This is totally unacceptable behavior and a violation of a person's rights in my opinion.  I just want to keep it real as they say.  I'm all for self-expression and I am generally non-judgmental or at least make an effort not to be, but I must call things for what they are.  I also must say that it is quite possible for the most unassuming and conservatively dressed woman to have a more lackadaisical attitude in selecting sexual partners (which I have no problem with just keep it safe).  Things are not always as they seem, and I am more persuaded to attempt to define a person by their actions rather than appearances or preconceived notions.