I am not saying that you have been neglecting us.  Recently we have had good relations.  We want to see that continue.  Putting this stuff that clearly violates NAFTA, an international agreement that we both ratified, into the bail out plan is threatening to our relationship.

 

This is a mutal contract between two independent bodies. It is clear that you have the more clout in the arragenment - you are the bigger country.  But we have some things (water, oil, other goods) that you might need in the future and we don't want a trade war. 

 Look, lets be real here - the USA is in a better position than Canada.  You could pass your "Buy American" part of the bill and we can't do a thing about it.  It makes sense to want to give priority to things produced in the United States.  All I am saying is that poking Canada in the eye on this one isn't going to get us anywhere.

The United States has a stake in Canada being a healthy economy.  We buy many of your exports and supply you with many products.  But I can empathise with you.  I am open minded person, there are many here who will race to erect more trade barriers.  The same is true in Europe.  Plus, many economists tout the benifits of free trade and are anti-protectionism.  Is protectionism really where you want to go?

by Xarxesb on 01/30/2009 08:15:04 PM EST

[ Parent ]
and needs to be renegotiated.  We DO have to look out for ourselves first, just like you guys do.  It sucks, but it's a hard reality of the current economic climate.

by jarett on 01/31/2009 12:06:50 PM EST

[ Parent ]
but I think Canada is off base with their complaints about targeted infrastructure spending.  Sounds more to me like sour grapes at not being allowed to eat part of the $819 billion pie.  Yet inquiring minds want to know: Is there no other area in which Canadian steel can be put to use?  In other words, how does such an act violate NAFTA when there are no limitations that would prevent Canadian businesses from, say, supplying steel for every other type of venture?  Unless of course, Canadians are assuming that nothing BUT infrastructure will be built in the coming years.  Like I said, I may not get it.  Feel free to educate me further.  It just seems to me that the "Buy American" act could actually give industries like Canadian steel more of an opportunity to impact the U.S. market, especially if U.S. steel gets hogged by infrastructure needs. 

by LeolasOldest on 01/31/2009 02:23:44 PM EST

[ Parent ]

An interesting comment....if the infrastructure construction in the bailout is big enough to hog all American steel that would open other people who need steel to the Canadian market.

 BTW that George Bush comment was just to get attention.  We don't miss him at all!

 

 

by Xarxesb on 01/31/2009 02:47:43 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Thanks Ken - I wrote on Friday, since then it seems that more and more leaders are up in arms about it.  Obama's team are starting to come around - I hope!

by Xarxesb on 02/03/2009 09:33:39 AM EST

[ Parent ]