I agree with many of the previous posts. Israels killing is generally seen more justified than the Palestinian even though the Israelis kill more people.
Now I think that it is worse to kill more people even if that is unintentially. BUT the question we also have to ask ourselves is if Hamas can be blamed for some of the Palestinian killings. I dont know the specifics on this one, but it appears that some members of Hamas are hiding on purpose among civilians to increase the risk of civilians killed thereby conducting propaganda warfare against Israel.
One can argue that Israel ultimatly chooses what to do and should be equally responsible in each case.
Im just sayin..

by DrT on 01/04/2009 07:07:11 AM EST

OK DrT we can ask, and we can answer. YES. It doesn't change the fact that we ALL have the responsibility to act according to certain set in stone principles that should not change according to the supposed expediency of the moment.

by AmericanMuslimGirl on 01/04/2009 07:12:10 AM EST

[ Parent ]
True, I also would like to think so. But its easier said than done.
Killing is always bad, unintentionally or not. It almost always leads to more killing. Both sides have to stop, preferably Israel first because they are the bigger and wealthier one (and also the source of the whole conflict).

by DrT on 01/04/2009 07:21:23 AM EST

[ Parent ]

that Hamas is going to stop if Israel does so? Israel has to stop either way, but that does not mean that Hamas will stop their eternal war on Israel over holy land and all that retaliation they feel they feel entitled to send back into Israel..

In my opinion having a policy that states that it's the right way to kill off an opponent's civilian population is just the worst position one can possibly have!

by Valhalla on 07/13/2010 02:59:38 PM EST

[ Parent ]

Hamas is now the elected government of Palestine.

It's one thing to say that a military force should not seek refuge among a civilian population but an elected government must necessarily be close to the population they serve. Hamas provides welfare stipends and food rations to the poor, police protection and medical services to Gaza at large, management and salaries for tens of thousands of civil servants and manages a smuggling/distribution system that brings consumer goods and currency to blockaded Gaza.

If the government is in a defacto exile, secluded to the country side - the suffering of Palestinians would only increase.

Another point I'd like to illustrate is the fact that Israel is not only assasinating high ranking Hamas officials and incurring colateral damage on the way. They are targeting civilian infrastructure e.g. bridges, power generators, graineries which they claim is focused on destroying Hamas' capability to fight back. This is standard procedure in an Israeli invasion. Look back to the last invasion of Lebanon where they bombed all of the ports and powerplants. Most collateral damage occures when the IDF hits these targets.

by sovnarkom on 01/04/2009 02:58:36 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I wonder if that's even possible.  Gaza is tiny and way over-populated. 

by Arna on 01/04/2009 06:20:33 PM EST

[ Parent ]