13 year old guy with hot teacher = no jail time, no question.
She should be fired, sure, but jail is ridiculous.
If you want to say that if you reverse the roles, the situation would be unacceptable, then that's fine, but there is no reasonable reason that laws must treat men and women exactly the same.
Men and women should be treated equally, yes, but not necessarily the same, because as any moron can see, men and women are not exactly the same, and therefore may require slightly different protections under the law.
Statutory rape, where given a certain hard number, it's always considered rape regardless of whether or not the alleged victim says the sex was consensual, is absolutely necessary. In the extreme, you can't have a 3-year-old on the stand, answering that question. It's ridiculous.
So there has to be some hard number, below which there is no discussion, such that if a sex act took place, it's rape.
Where that number should be, and whether or not the sexes of the alleged offenders and/or victims, should be taken into account, I can't say. That's not my area of expertise.
However, as someone who has been a 13-year-old guy, I know for certain that no crime occurred in this case, and it's ridiculous to to put this chick in jail for what a vast majority of 13-year-old guys would give their left nut for.
by
cored on
10/31/2009 01:01:44 PM EST