Why doesnt your party start showing some results before you go name calling the other side.

The elections of 2010 and 2012 are going to be votes against Democrats and their Tax & Spend disasters...

You guys CONTROL the White House & Congress and still cant get anything done!

And you dare call Conservatives "teh Crazies"?

by bobo1 on 11/19/2009 01:17:59 PM EST

Rather "Tax & Spend" ....... which has shown to balance the budget

Than "Tax Cuts" & "Borrow & Spend" by you Conservatives . . which has been the real disasters ...

Since the last 30 years there has been 3 proclaimed Fiscal Conservatives & 1 tax & spend Democrat ... Bobo why is it that . .they only one among the 4 who has been able to balance the budget is the Tax & Spender???????

And you wonder why we call you folks "teh Crazies"??? .. LOL

A Proud Progressive!!!

by teron678 on 11/19/2009 01:38:25 PM EST

[ Parent ]

 

Name calling? You haven't seen name calling yet , pal. I don't recall asking for your opinion here but since you did;

One thing I know about you bobo is regardless of which party is in charge you are always on the "other" side.  In the vernacular I believe you are a contrarian " poser " or " bandwagonier" . I dare say your beliefs and principles are "fluid" Suggestion, if you want validation, find Kens latest tome and suck his crank. He might even thank you for it with a 'donation' or a honorary degree!

Therefore, in my humble opinion, your "opinion" has about as much validity as Palins abstinence teachings, Kens diplomas or Fox news.

Recall the US budget surplus when YOUR PARTY took office in 2001. In fact ,YOUR PARTY controlled both house of congress for most of Bushe's terms and didn't get anything done unless you count running up the deficit.

Please note that YOUR PARTY has controlled the White House and one or both houses of Congress for 28 of the last 40 years. 40 years that the US has been running a deficit.

Running record deficits during the GOP administrations and particularly  the  Housing Bubble when YOUR PARTY was in charge didn't seem to be a problem for you and your thick fore headed, knuckle dragging friends.

Now that the economy is in the tank and the Fed is the only thing between the US and a great depression, now your worried about deficits.

Hypocrite.

So, another and final suggestion, if you want to pick a fight, pick a side.

Otherwise, like the sign says,  shut the fuck up.

by Sock Puppet Fred on 11/19/2009 02:52:57 PM EST

[ Parent ]
A sad tale for sure...

His messiah ObaMao has control of all of the power in the government and yet they cant even pass one meaningful piece of legislation... :(

So now instead of selling his ideas and generating support for his beliefs and values, he'd rather sit and bitch and complain about those "Wascillay Wepubwicans" who ruined our country, only to discover that in actuality there was NEVER a budget surplus, only unrealistic projections of one based on short term financing of loans and monies that never came to fruition...

He also sits and wonders how we got here, knowing that Democrats have controlled the congress (the ones who spend the money in those defecit eras) about 40 of the last 50 years (the only non Democrat control being 1994-2006) He likes to twist figures like "One or the other", but in fact we all know that spending can only originate in the House...

He dreams that the housing bubble was a "Wepubwican Pwobwem" when in fact is was "Bawney Fwank" and "Chawie Wangel" who told us that we were racists for not giving homeloans to poor colored people who couldnt afford to pay them back... So much for the "Wepubwican theowy" on that one...

He forgets that "major legislation" was passed during the Bush years, but most of it was to protect us from further attack and to bomb stupid Muslims back into the stone age, so that doesnt count in his eyes...


Hell, Barack ObaMao hasnt introduced ANY major war legislation and he STILL cant get any domestic changes accomplished even though he has control of the whole damn system!

All ObaMao has to do is say the word and our worries in iraq and Afghanistan could be home by Christmas - but of course, that doesnt benefit him or his party politically, so he'll bring them home around the middle of next October just before the 2010 election (how convienent). How many soldiers will die needlessly to benefit ObaMao politically???


Bitching about Bush and the Wascally Wepubwicans will get you nowhere, Russ - Like the old bumper sticker says "Cash, Grass or Ass: Nobody Rides for Free" - Its time for ObaMao and the Dems to PUT OUT OR GET OUT...

:) Hope the grandbabies are well....



by bobo1 on 11/19/2009 03:42:54 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Bobo1 .. your party had nothing to do with the deficits it was all the Democrats doing ... & please don't give me this B.S about  the house spends the money .. where were the fiscal conservatives from 2000 - 2006?????

Plus as proclaimed Fiscal Conservatives ... why didn't the Dubya, Bush Snr, or Raygun (the top 3 budget deficit contributors in modern US history) ... veto these Bills???

& what  "major legislation" did Dubya pass??? >> "FISA", "Patriot Act" & "Terror Alert Levels" all which were considered unconstitutional by those who actually follow the constitution

You say Obama hasn't done nothing ... so why the name "ObaMao"???

The Deficit is only important . . when you folks are out of power ......

A Proud Progressive!!!

by teron678 on 11/19/2009 04:14:35 PM EST

[ Parent ]

WTF are you talking about? "Wascillay Wepubwicans"?

That is a talent, I must say, typing like your giving a blow job. No, wait you think I 'm Ken! or are you drunk...again?

I am glad you know what I'm thinking.  Like I said, take a side or shut the fuck up.

So tell me Kreskin,  what am I thinking now?

But here's a little water to throw on your wingnut fantasy:

Drunk Bobo says  "there was NEVER a budget surplus, only unrealistic projections of one based on short term financing of loans and monies that never came to fruition..."

CBO the nonpartisan budget analysis arm of Congress said:

Congressional Budget Office projects higher 2000 budget surplus.

May 12, 2000

 The Congressional Budget Office said Friday that the projected U.S. budget surplus will exceed $200 billion for this fiscal year, up from its previous estimate of $179 billion.

The CBO, the nonpartisan budget analysis arm of Congress, also said that the portion of the surplus excluding Social Security reserves should top $40 billion, up from its previous $26 billion estimate for fiscal 2000, which ends September 30.

Higher budget surplus projections will likely ignite an already hot election year debate over whether to use the money for tax cuts or government spending.

Leaders of both parties have vowed not to use surplus funds from the Social Security trust fund, which leaves the estimated $40 billion for the fight over how to spend it.

The new figures could be good news for Texas Gov. George W. Bush, the likely Republican presidential nominee, who has agreed that there is enough of a federal surplus to pay for his five-year, $483 billion tax cut as well as spending proposals on education, health-care, housing and the environment. allpolitics.com

So I guess that Bush knew there was no budget surplus..and started deficit spending anyway.

So stick to teaching...no..don't do that either Arizona is 43rd in achievement test rankings.

Your response show why.

Way to go.

 (They are fine)

by Sock Puppet Fred on 11/19/2009 05:39:42 PM EST

[ Parent ]
WTF are you talking about?

Why bother asking him when it's clear he has no idea?

by OneHitKill on 11/20/2009 11:16:02 AM EST

[ Parent ]

I'm still wondering where the Elmer Fudd ebonics came from.

ObaMao? Is that a wing nut inside joke? I'm sure the nutters were rolling in the isles when they read that.

He is also factually impaired. I suppose being Kens understudy has rubbed off.

I don't mind having a discussion but when a poster tells me what I'm thinking, particularly when I haven't even intimated that thought, ever, is a pisser.

 

by Sock Puppet Fred on 11/20/2009 01:07:35 PM EST

[ Parent ]