Something being the truth doesn't always mean that it has any implications on how we act or how we should act.
When we are talking about gay adoption it really doesn't matter whether it is a choice.
There is no reason to assume that being gay is in any way immoral, unless you believe that the planet is seriously underpopulated and it's everybodies responsibility to fuck so we can raise the population to the needed level.
"What prevents them from giving birth to kids is being male, not being gay. They can still raise kids via adoption..."
Wow, you really got me there, that devaluates the whole argument that they can't pass on their genetic information.
"Homophobes will never find a cure, because there is none. It's not psychological.
Even if they tried to manipulate biology, it will be decades before they'll be successful. It will take time for the older generations to die out."
That it's not psychological doesn't make it less likely that they can find a "cure". If anything the opposite. And it defenitly can't keep them from looking for "cures" and trying them. Adopting a child is not the same as being the biological father. Why shouldn't gay people be given the opportunity to father a kid in a natural way? When someone has low sperm count he doesn't get told it's no problem. You can adopt. No doctors are looking for a cure. Even though it is biological.
Therfore the fact that it is biologically determined is a bad argument, even though it is true. It still has nothing to do with the issue. Let's assume pedophelia is biological, does that make it correct?
To anyone reading the last sentence: I'm not saying being gay is like being a pedo. The reasons why you can't compare these two "preferences" are ethical, not biological.
"The first thing Fascists usually try to do is silencing the opposition."
by
opposition on
11/21/2009 05:50:06 PM EST
[
Parent ]