As I said to start with, there is a great deal of strawman bullshit to sift through. There are so-called "claims" which have been made simply so that they may then be "debunked".

It requires patience to evaluate the evidence carefully.

by RedPossum on 11/08/2009 01:41:33 PM EST

[ Parent ]

AE 9/11 spews pure nonsense. Im sure Gage at least is making big bucks with speaking fees. Start with these:

"What Did and Did not Cause Collapse of WTC Twin Towers in New York"  Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE, Vol. 134 (2008).

Refutation of controlled demolition theory. Discusses matching of video record with progressive collapse equations, "free-fall" claims, concrete crushing (and how much TNT equivalent would be needed to do that crushing), air pressure & ejection of air, spread of dust cloud.

 Debunking 9/11 Debunking:PDF

Clear, concise refutation of David Chandler's WTC 7 "freefall" claims, by "alienentity." Part 1. Part 2.  See also his video "WTC7 Collapse."

by Sock Puppet Fred on 11/08/2009 02:50:46 PM EST

[ Parent ]
They started this whole controlled demolition myth. Most sane people do their best to show that they are nonsense.

This is a perfect strawman.

The people who are most likely to say that the Bush government was responsible (organising, training or just looking the other way) now explain why it was no controlled demolition.

That's totally brilliant.

The government is responsible, and they don't even have to deny it, because they had people claiming they did it a certain way. They didn't do it that way, which can be proven. The general gist people get is they didn't do it.

"The first thing Fascists usually try to do is silencing the opposition."

by opposition on 11/08/2009 03:16:18 PM EST

[ Parent ]