The attack has an omen in the film long kiss goodnight - patsy, war, and all... it should be a hint to the intellectually prudent, that the official 911 conspiracy has never been able use physical models to reproduce their magical physics.  

If office furniture burns as hot to release the kind of energy, they'd be stuffing rockets full of office furniture for moon launches.

The fact that they fudged, underfinanced and lied about was the investigation - and that the public accepted it as a genuine reichstag fire on home soil - speaks to the decline and wretchedness of empire.

Some things are very curious about it; the thermal image of the site days after demolition suggests some sort of thermal charge.  The total pulverisation of all the concrete to fine dust and the banana peel is an awesome amount of energy.  No wonder the 911 believers cannot reproduce their magic physics, like the magic bullet with kennedy, its all harry potter and computer games.

The finnish military expert explains how there was enough energy to vaporize all 200,000 gallons of water in the roof tanks of each tower, and to pulverize all the concrete, melt the core and ensure a total failure.

However, the section of this paper on target coupling explains the superheated cloud, the ablating steel flying off the building, the toasted cars, and the earthquakes and the missing lake of water (that's 5 acre-feet - one entire floor of the WTC top, 5 feet deep in water - bouf - disappeared.  The energy to disappear the water and do all the observed after the jet fuel was mostly burned off - begs physics inquiry.

If the link fails, the paper you can search up is called "Fourth generation nuclear weapons: military effectiveness and collatoral effects."

How much energy to take 10 meters thick of solid concrete floors from inside the towers and turn them to dust - its immmense, any person with common sense knows that if they hurl a chunk of concrete off el-capitan, it will break, but it won't turn to fine dust -.  

Actually, considering they designed all the metanarratives along with the story in their little cheney bunker, all the twists and turns were predefined from the getgo in the great story to sucker the masses and to marginalize any intellectual or industry person capable enough to know the physics of building collapse or to blow the whistle on it.  The public has bought in to it, its a dirty family lie that has to be protected to keep the national wounding and vengeful pissing war of money on to a dead cold war military machine alive.

They don't want the intellectual class, so they created a perfect wedge to cut off all real engineers and physicists and people capable of science... modern bolsheviks speak in these blogs, blaring out their communist propaganda of the day.  Its not antiintellectual, its an anti-intelligence rebellion of staggering efficiency.

I think they believed that the nukes would be more noticable, and they had a whole backup patsy story with suitcase bombs, but they didn't need to use it.  Baudrillard's writings on simulacra explain the operational real they've created without atmosphere, where every mind gets sucked in to the dialectic of pre-programmed narratives, long ago planned in a rumsfeldian unknown.  

I admire your bravery for outing the repeaters, redpossum.  Given that the white house is paying people to infiltrate internets and spin up the 911 story, how many are paid agents of the man? and sadder still, how many are unpaid keyboard numpties repeating their bedttime stories.

by sweetheart on 07/19/2010 11:17:38 AM EST

[ Parent ]
This theory is better than some of the strawmen that are often set up.

It addresses the pulverizing of the concrete; and the nature of the planes and their accuracy, and the clownish flight training of the alleged perpetrators.

I don't doubt that the people concerned are morally capable of it; and though I don't like conspiracy theories I know there are conspiracies.

The main problem is that it would have been so damned hard to pull off; so complicated and requiring such coordination.

So I have to file it under "interesting" pending further evidence.

I sometimes wonder what Bush was thinking during those minutes in the classroom. Was it something like: "Who would want a pet goat; dogs are much better... What was that about a plane?" Or could it have been more like: "Oh god, they've actually done it! Can we really get away with this? Can I carry off that 'war president' act they've had me practicing?"

by Landbeyond on 07/20/2010 01:03:40 PM EST

[ Parent ]