"The radio bands no longer belong to the people of the United States than do internet bandwidth."

And case law aside, what evidence do you offer other than opinion?

"No, you are a paid blogger assigned to counter anyone that posts something negative about the government or Obama." by Mcamelyne II on 05/17/2011

by Robrob on 03/19/2009 12:03:49 AM EST

[ Parent ]
 On the bill of rights..they definately shouldnt use the right wing libertarian cato institute to do it.

Those whack jobs believe that public libraries are socialism and drunk driving should not be punishable because it infringes on a persons privacy.

try again


by Chinese Democracy on 03/19/2009 10:28:16 AM EST

[ Parent ]
The internet is a fundamentally different medium from licensed broadcasts.  The two are only barely comparable.  Saying that those who are licensed to broadcast must serve the public in some way is entirely reasonable.  Saying that every host on the internet must do the same in the same way is completely absurd if you understand ANYTHING about the infrastructure of either.

by jarett on 03/19/2009 09:05:01 PM EST

[ Parent ]
But don't seem to ever explain how you think the fairness doctrine will limit free speech?

"No, you are a paid blogger assigned to counter anyone that posts something negative about the government or Obama." by Mcamelyne II on 05/17/2011

by Robrob on 03/20/2009 12:19:51 AM EST

[ Parent ]

"Democrats won't touch the Fairness Doctrine"

Great!  Problem solved!  Commence shutting up about it.

by Spencer on 03/20/2009 02:39:58 PM EST

[ Parent ]
In all that "preaching" you still have yet to explain how you think the fairness doctrine will restrict Limbaugh's freedom of speech.

"No, you are a paid blogger assigned to counter anyone that posts something negative about the government or Obama." by Mcamelyne II on 05/17/2011

by Robrob on 03/21/2009 07:32:12 PM EST

[ Parent ]