9 scientists find Nano-Thermite Explosive in 9/11 samples | 46 comments (46 topical, 0 hidden)
Summary (none / 1)

I allow myself to summarize the above comment, so you don't have to read it:

"The publication in question was written by a scientist and reviewed by two other scientists, so SHUT THE F@@k UP!"

 

by OldGerman on 04/18/2009 03:40:50 PM EST

[ Parent ]
9 scientists wrote the report (none / 0)
That fact is easily surmised by the HEADLINE of this frigging thread.

It was reviewed by an independent PANEL of scientists who had no skin in the game either way.

Lots of trash talk here - very little substance beyond the peer-reviewed scientific report itself. Look at the quality of the criticisms here -- false analogies, broadside slurs, outright lies -- and contrast them with the research itself - scientific, comprehensive, peer-reviewed.

An interesting contrast indeed.  Draw your own conclusions.

I'm not making the claim that the the government or the White House was responsible for 9/11. But clear evidence of explosives at the scene of the crime are a concrete rationale for a new investigation. The 9/11 Commission has been widely panned as a fraud polluted by conflicts of interest -- even in the mainstream media.  

by truthisall on 04/18/2009 04:03:18 PM EST

[ Parent ]

9 scientists find Nano-Thermite Explosive in 9/11 samples | 46 comments (46 topical, 0 hidden)