9 scientists find Nano-Thermite Explosive in 9/11 samples | 46 comments (46 topical, 0 hidden)
Your links PREDATE THE PEER-REVIEWED PAPER! (none / 0)
We're talking about the scientific integrity of the peer-reviewed paper, correct??? The one that was just published???

Then WHY on God's green earth are your links from 2006 and 2007?

Let's talk about the research at hand, shall we? Send me a SINGLE link to someone questioning the integrity of this study and then we can have a conversation.

by truthisall on 04/18/2009 09:47:57 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Its called building a case... (none / 0)

And I thought that part was obvious. He is well known for jumping to conclusions, so parden me if I think the source of his "WTC chips" is questionable.

From the comments made here, and also the ones to Robrob, I think I am done here until you have something real to add. My guess, and its just a guess, is that you probably don't know a whole lot about what happened and are following the conspiracy theories out of ignorance (meaning lack of knowledge). ...and please stop refering to the accepted sequence of events as the Official Conspiracy Theory or the Bush-Cheney Conspiracy, it really doesn't help your side.

by Hilikus9191 on 04/19/2009 12:46:21 AM EST

[ Parent ]
The scientific integrity still not challenged (none / 0)
Bountiful personal attacks, no substance, imprecise or outright incorrect definitions of terms.  And not a single link critical of the peer-reviewed research we're talking about.

Intelligent, reasonable people aren't generally convinced by this sort of desperate debating tactic, regardless of where they stand on an issue.

Still waiting for a link to a legitimate scientist criticizing the integrity of this peer-reviewed research:

http://rawstory.com/news/20 08/Scientists_find_active_s uperthermite_in_WTC_0404.ht ml



by truthisall on 04/19/2009 10:57:43 AM EST

[ Parent ]

9 scientists find Nano-Thermite Explosive in 9/11 samples | 46 comments (46 topical, 0 hidden)