9 scientists find Nano-Thermite Explosive in 9/11 samples | 46 comments (46 topical, 0 hidden)
More about the buildings' collapse (none / 0)
WTC Building #7 (a 47-story high-rise not  hit by an airplane) exhibits all the characteristics of a classic controlled demolition with explosives:  (and some non-standard characteristics)
1.  Rapid onset of “collapse”
2.  Sounds of explosions at ground floor - a full second prior to collapse
3.  Symmetrical “collapse” – through the path of greatest resistance – at free-fall speed
4. Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed mostly in its own footprint
5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds
6. Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly-qualified witnesses
7.  Chemical signature of Thermite (high tech incendiary) found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples by physics professor Steven Jones, PhD.
8.  FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
9. Expert corroboration from the top European Controlled Demolition professional
10. Fore-knowledge of “collapse” by media, NYPD, FDNY

And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.
1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)
3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”.

Source: www.ae911truth.org

by Cincy911Truth on 04/19/2009 01:44:15 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Wrong on all accounts here (none / 0)
No need for a longer response as clearly you are ignorant or crazy.

by Hilikus9191 on 04/19/2009 02:58:01 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Invective instead of reason=warning sign (none / 0)
I must have been mistaken about you earlier, Hilikaus. "Clearly you are ignorant of crazy." What a compelling, insightful argument! No low blows, full of logic and reason. You know what? You're right. I've changed my mind. I'm going to ignore this peer-reviewed research and take your account at face value from now on. Thanks for your help on this. </sarcasm>

by truthisall on 04/19/2009 04:01:04 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Ok enough (none / 0)

A lot of this stuff is covered elsewhere and I'm tired of doing your homework for you. Please see this site.

http://www.debunking911.com /index.html

It is updated quite frequently from what i can tell. It's not my only source of some information but it is a good place for a large collection of the information. They update when truthers complain or take issue with certain things. You should check it out if you have not seen it yet.

by Hilikus9191 on 04/19/2009 08:05:19 PM EST

[ Parent ]

9 scientists find Nano-Thermite Explosive in 9/11 samples | 46 comments (46 topical, 0 hidden)