1)-You may know this, but it's worth repeating: Weight and height alone are antiquated measures. It's all about body composition, aka the percentage of bodyfat relative to lean meass.
Someone can be 6'1 250 and in amazing muscular shape or they can be clinically obese and at increased risk for a variety of health conditions. Weight has some use but bodyfat percentage is far more important. Someone can be at a "normal weight" and still be unhealthy.
2)-It's the biology stupid. NOTE: That was a fun play on words based on Clinton, just so you don't read it the wrong way. At any rate, it's true. Being into clear skin and a certain waist-hip-ratio is not society, it's biology.
It's on our genes to seek these things out, and research (by Helen Fisher and many others) shows that symmetry, clear skin and a particular waist-hip-ratio spans cultures across the globe. With that said, society puts these natural ingrained desires on steroids through make-up, air-brushing, push-up bras, tanning, etc.
Generally speaking marketers don't create phyiscal desires out of thin air, they just exaggerate our existing desires and create an unrealistic ideal to keep the physical perfection carrott just out of our reach.
3)-Did you see the other day when Cenk and Ana agreed that Scarlett Johannson had lost too much weight and she looked better before? I completely agree with them.
And I've said many times in the past that too many women fall into the trap of excessive diet and cardio (and tanning). But like many things in life, there should be some balance.
Unfortunately the bottom line is that judging others based on physical appearance is not a purely societal construct, it's a deeply biological one. Should we try to recognize how society exaggerates and exploits this for profit? Yes. But it's often times fighting an uphill battle IMO.
The other tricky thing is that America is the fattest country on earth! We have this strange polarization of perfect and completely unhealthy, sedentary slobs.
by
Tom Hanc on
04/09/2009 03:16:54 PM EST