This conversation has already been closed, and your weak attempt to reopen it is not fooling anyone outside of Fox News viewers and Limbaugh/Savage fans.
Better luck next time!
That's Twba's M.O. Hide under a rock until the discussion ends, then do a super-secret guerrilla comment post and pray that someone's still around to read it. He's more of a subversive than he knows in that respect.
Right. And don't forget his part-time volunteer work at the research lab where he masturbates woodland rodents.
I don't think you get it. The gist of your "argument" has already been debunked by myself and MRFred. Feel free to reread our comments.
By your "logic", Pat Buchanan isn't right wing because he fiercely opposes unregulated trade and starting wars with Iraq (etc.). You're attempting more false equivalency bullshit by cherry picking a handful of examples, i.e. the exception(s) that proves the rule.
Someone seems to think Pat is a libertarian. I'm sure you'll be in a big hurry to straighten him out.
A liberal person is in favor of free trade. An illiberal person is not in favor of free trade. Pat Buchanan is illiberal on the issue of trade. So are you.
