I'm all in favor of following the evidence wherever it leads.  we should redouble our efforts to get at the truth because we've seen the kind of damage that can be done by incompetence.  but there are no trails leading to either active or passive conspiracies to support or permit the attacks.  sure, ask the questions that need to be asked.  but quit wasting our time saying "oh! looky here!  it has to be a conspiracy because i haven't seen all the evidence!"  if i hear one more person say "it must be a conspiracy because they haven't released all the evidence" i'm going to vomit on someone's shirt, and it won't be mine.  just the NIST's engineering reports about the collapse of the world trade center are almost three feet thick!

http://wtc.nist.gov/

would you like to guess how much evidence there is for bombs having been planted and set off in the buildings?  NONE.

if you collect all of the various reports from responsible investigating agencies, you'd need a new library.  the 9/11 Commission alone collected thousands of boxes of documents.  i'm sick of these people who keep saying there's no evidence when they just don't want to look at it.

that "loose change" film is the height of stupid.  those boys kept asking stupid questions like "where are the parts of the planes".   I'll tell you where they are: they were smashed to smithereens in crashes at 500 miles per hour you idiots!  and they've been collected and reassembled.  i'm sorry if no one found those microscopic pieces the day of the crashes.  that doesn't mean that they weren't there.

sure, i want people to keep asking the questions.  but they should quit wasting our time with these stupid conspiracy theories until they've got some honest answers.  so far, they've got nothing.

what i want to know is how we're going to make sure that the executives in charge don't ignore the warnings from people like Richard Clarke when those warnings are shoved in their faces. how could condoleeza rice say she doesn't know or doesn't remember such dire warnings?  why is dick fucking cheney saying that it's Richard Clarke's fault that we were unprepared even though Clarke tried to warn them more than once?

investigate that for me, please?

by parplights on 06/09/2009 11:29:39 PM EST

[ Parent ]