is the back and forth.
The subject of the boycott thinks so too, as long as you are the "back" and he is the "forth". As soon as the subject is bested or the subject of a mild joke, out comes the knives, either in that thread, or in other threads, where the insults fly.
I have yet, after years of trying, to have a conversation about serious issues with the boycott subject simply because that is not his goal. He will not honestly discuss anything. Period. When you engage him and concede even the littlest point, out comes the victory dance replete with insults. So the debate he claims to crave is in reality an Internet version of the Charlie Brown and Lucy football trick.
Every thread is a tired rehash of GOP/ pundit talking points, dishonestly presented in such a way to belittle and ridicule the participants or hijack the conversation into a flame contest. The "I'm rich and you're a loser" theme permeates his post. The obvious reason he participates is a heretofore undisclosed need to reinforce his self esteem at the expense of others. .
Like I said about we don't care if your conservative. Every system, mechanical, economic or political needs some form of restraint ,from the left or right, or the reaction will become uncontrolled with catastrophic consequences.
Politically, conservatives provide that function. We need them, they need us. Without the back and forth, no progress will be made.
In regard to the boycott subject, Its tiresome and we aren't playing anymore.

by
MRFred on
02/04/2010 10:41:05 AM EST
[
Parent ]