7 years maybe, but thats just to stem the flow of outgoing justices...
I think there ought to be stricter requirements of them as well. Right now in theory the President could nominate his mother in Law to be a justice. They dont even have to have a degree in law. They only need a pulse...
I think the constitution should be changed for term limits on Senators and reps too - 2 terms then no more. We need to curb the Orrin hatchs and Ted Kennedy 40+ years in the same comfy seat...
But with this new ruling, I guess anything goes. The multinationals could keep a corpse like McConnell or Lieberman on their seat until they they are literally rotting, and probably afterward with the right advertising...
:)
...call it 10 years for a Supreme Court justice term. That way, there will absolutely be a new president in office when the Justice needs to be re-confirmed (a President cannot serve longer than 10 years), but a justice confirmed at age 56 won't have to be over 70 when they finally have to be accountable for their judgments.
I welcome you to the correct side of an issue for once. And am sorry that I wrongly accused you of voting for Bush. But no one in this equation is acting like Karl Marx. That is a bullsh*t strawman and you know it, Bobo. You think Obama and Pelosi and Reid are Marxists? Under THIS political system? Obama and Reid are CENTRISTS, and even the Progressive Left is simply trying to edge the political center of the country toward the true 50-yard line from its own 20 where it is now. And now you KNOW we are right about the government, and not on some crazy fringe looking for radical change. The radicals are the CONSERVATIVES and it is time that you get off of our jockstraps and go after the REAL VILLAINS.
I don't want to hear you EVER say again how dangerous mainstream Liberalism is--not after THIS COURT DECISION just destroyed the country.
