<!-- @page { margin: 0.79in } P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } -->
It seems I accidentily over-wrote my original reply, so re-typing.
First, thanks for the feedback!
You are correct that my positions currently listed are a little short, and I'm working on getting more in-depth position descriptions written up. I wanted to get -something- up sooner, if that makes sense.
I would -strongly- encourage folks to challenge me or give me feedback, I want to make sure my responses/positions are articulate and follow logically.
On the specific issue you mentioned of unreasonable restrictions on the right to bear arms, NH has a pretty effective state-level position at the moment. I list it on my site as it's an important local issue, and people want to hear from someone who's more “on the left” that I don't want to take their guns. In this context, I'd consider an “unreasonable” restriction as something that prevents a law abiding citizen from responsible posession of a firearm in general. I don't have any issues against things such as waiting periods, trigger locks, and the like. They may be unpopular among gun owners, but don't restrict the right to own a firearm in the first place, so I see no conflict.
On the specific issue of healthy lunch, I've read a few case studies which showed healthy menus to cost less for schools then the current junk-food. My main priority is to focus on efficiency rather then cuts. There -are- some areas in the NH budget that are prioritized a little strange (public works going to under-used roads rather then highly-used, etc) but unlike conservatives I'd rather see such priorities sorted out rather then just “cut the spending”. I'm not sure if that really answered your question very well, I guess the main point is “the answer isn't always cuts” in my opinion.
The partisan issue is an -excellent- topic, and I think a good opinion on it might be better served by a stand-alone write up rather then a chunk in a comment. Check my site out in a few days, I think it's an important issue to talk about (speaking as an independent rather then a party member). In general, my “gut instinct” is that I feel personal priorities should trump party-line loyalties. My reason for being upset about the pay-go vote as an example is that some of those republicans who voted against it have been on the record supporting it in the past. Their party loyalty forced them to vote no, which forced all the democrats to vote party-line regardless of individual support, and the problem perpetuates itself.
by
gentimjs on
02/03/2010 01:30:38 PM EST
[
Parent ]