I don't know much about Islam besides the quick 5 minute lecture I got from an information session at school a week ago, but I did hear about many marriages including a 9 year old girl to Muhammad as instructed by god.

Now if this occurred 1400 years ago as you said, then this marriage occurred when man barely lived to 30 before succumbing to the simplest illnesses. It's therefore much more reasonable to be married to a 9-year old then as opposed to today. Calling him a pervert is a little ignorant by any means.

However, I don't find that's the issue here; the issue is that those with Islamic beliefs use Muhammad's guide as a modern excuse to marry a 9 year old child. Today we live to be 70 years old on average and rising, puberty does not occur until the pre-teen ages, and psychological studies blatantly find that sexual acts with a child before puberty cause drastic long-term consequences to their well-being.

These people use Muhammad's passage as a modern-day excuse to be ignorant and pedophilic, and I believe that's the issue.

by kirkus on 02/04/2010 08:50:55 PM EST

could be that in previous era's marriage wasn't about love or sex as much as it was about a deal struck between two families, either about goods heritage or nobility. In the middle-ages in Europe marriage or the promise of marriage at very young age amongst more affluent classes wasn't uncommon and such marriages were quite often not consumated, but men had a mistress on the side.

sig:"TYT: no longer rinkydink"

by wouter666 on 02/05/2010 03:01:12 PM EST

[ Parent ]