the facts or are you just willfully ignoring what is written. Of course she has a right to education. the same as everyone else. What she does not have the right to do is disrupt the class to the point where every other student is negatively affected by her actions. Turn the tables on your nonsense stance. Would it be OK if I stated that my"religion" required that I only be taught by naked women with a bustline of 40+. Don't tell me I'm ridiculous because every religion is ridiculous to people who don't believe its tenants. Of course the school would just say OK we have to hire a large breasted teacher for this student. Right? Why didn't I think of this when I was in HS. Let me state again because I know you are having trouble, she has a right to an education. What she does not have the right to do is hinder every other student from having the same opportunity. She needs to find an all woman's school. Don't tell me this restricts her, she restricts herself. She has every right to her religious beliefs. She does not have the right to have there be NO consequence from her beliefs.
Lastly, what happened to you to make you so over the top nasty. Get some therapy.
What you are suggesting may seem like the logical thing in the short term, but there will be many other women in her position who are potentially being refused an education by this decision.
You don't win by forcing her to remove her Niqab, you win by educating her. That should be the priority.
These kinds of rejectionist policies are gathering all sorts of "righteous argument" to support them but they boil down to the same thing, intolerance.
I have seen far too many cold blooded attacks on Muslim clothing throughout Europe over the last few years to believe that this case is "Genuine". What is far more likely is that it is another opportunistic attempt to undermine the faith of these people by forcing them to abandon their religious convictions.
