10/08/2006 08:14:47 PM EST

Former Page: Sex With R-Rep. Foley

posted by RealityBias


Ex-page tells of Foley liaison
Los Angeles Times

Sunday, October 08, 2006

A former House page says he had sex with then-Rep. Mark Foley, R-Fla., after receiving explicit e-mails in which the congressman described assessing the sexual orientation and physical attributes of underage pages but waiting until later to make direct advances.

The Full Story

Email Print
Google Technorati del.icio.us digg reddit Facebook
Will this have any effect on this Hastert/Laesch house race?
< Child Predators: The Fight Continues | Those bad, bad liberals are ruining our lives >
 Display:
Former Page: Sex With R-Rep. Foley | 8 comments (8 topical, 0 hidden)
Will they replace Hastert? (none / 0)
Are they going to try to run another candidate instead of Hastert?  Isn't it too late to change his name on the ballot?

by RealityBias on 10/08/2006 08:17:12 PM EST

No reason to. (none / 0)
The only thing Hastert is in danger of losing is the House Majority seat, not his actual seat in Congress. That would be a Republican in-fighting problem, not a general "voting" issue. He will face his constituents as expected in November.

by MedfordTim on 10/09/2006 07:10:21 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Sorry this is a duplicate (none / 0)
Acroso posted this story first in another thread.  He's like Fox news, injecting an innoculation.

by RealityBias on 10/08/2006 08:24:22 PM EST

Hastert (none / 0)
Throwing Hastert to the wolves would be a false admission of guilt in a misreported gay sex scandal. If anything a cannibalistic feeding frenzy would only fuel the left. They'd want Boehner next and then Bunt, next Bush, etc etc etc. This is all about nothing except a media attempt to hijack an election because the left is for the most part bankrupt on patriotism and ideas.

Hastert is an excellent majority leader and it should stay that way.

by acroso on 10/08/2006 08:33:42 PM EST

oo (none / 0)
ooo now Drudge has this story up also.

by acroso on 10/08/2006 08:51:25 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Pelosi and Rob knew (none / 0)
Rob Emmanuel and Nancy Pelosi both refuse to go under oath on the Foley scandal.

I imagine both of them knew of this for months and had saved it. They then misreported it as some sort of child sex scandal when in reality it was a gay internet IMs scandal. Divert the public from their plan to turn the U.S.A. into a third world country and their plan to surrender in the war on terror.

by acroso on 10/08/2006 09:01:21 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Why? (none / 0)

Who asked them to go under oath? What would be the purpose of it? As far as Drudge goes, he hasn't gotten much right so far. he has come up with 3 or 4 different scenarios that are easily refuteable. Its actually fun watching him flail about trying to find something that will stick.

by ZenDiggity on 10/09/2006 07:19:29 AM EST

[ Parent ]
ha,ha,ha,ha (none / 0)
How could Dems go after them, wouldn't be because they are a pack of lying, thieving, pedophile protecting, race baiting gay bashers, huh?

Wouldn't be because they broke any laws huh?

Bush doesn't have to worry, with so many signing statements, he can ignore any law or oath (like defending the constitution)


BUT ONLY IF YOU ARE REPUBLICAN


If you are a Dem, they will investigate you for things that didn't happen decades before. If they can't find anything they will keep investigating even if it means investigating your cat.

by LORD FOUL on 10/08/2006 09:06:36 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Former Page: Sex With R-Rep. Foley | 8 comments (8 topical, 0 hidden)
 Display: