How Al Gore Should Run

Google Technorati del.icio.us digg reddit
If you like this story, digg it!
In these last six years, Al Gore has courageously spoken out against global warming, the Iraq War and gross constitutional violations of this administration. As Rolling Stone points out in their latest issue, he is a different guy now than the cautious politician he was back in 2000.

So, I propose that he run that way.

He knows he's the right guy for the job. He knows that, above all the other candidates, he has the right priorities and the right experience. He has the support of the netroots and the base of the party is behind him.

The one thing that people say is stopping him is the idea that he might lose. What if he runs and loses? Wouldn't that be humiliating?

Losing the primary of your own party would be embarrassing after you've already run for president and won the popular vote. But here's my radical new question - so what?

If Al Gore threw caution to the wind and ran - even though he might lose - that would only make him more of a hero, not less. I don't give a damn what the mainstream press says (though, of course, I recognize that they are very relevant to the horse race aspect of the campaign). We, the people, would know. We would know that he did it for the right reasons and that we would support him, win or lose.

Current events aren't always kind to those who are right, but history is. Gore's already been proven right about global warming, that he's been warning us about for decades. He's been proven right about Iraq, even though he was dismissed at the time by the press who think they're so smart now.

And if he runs courageously for all the right reasons, history will prove him right again whether he wins or loses politically. So, in the worst case scenario, he has to deal with the gaggling, annoying and often idiotic press when he loses. But I propose that this is not such a tragedy. The much greater tragedy is if he doesn't have the courage to do the right thing when we need him.

Frank Luntz, the GOP strategist, is right for the first time in a long time. He says Gore should use the word imagine as the theme of his campaign. As in: Imagine if he'd won in 2000. How much would the country be better off if we had Al Gore as president the last eight years instead of the disastrous reign of George W. Bush?

But it goes further. Imagine for a second if he wins now. A man who understands the urgency of our time. A man who understand how great this country can be if we head down the right path. A man who can open up the great magnanimous nature of this nation and build bridges to the rest of the world.

Someone who can put an end to the egregious constitutional backsliding that endangers the very foundation of the country. Someone who can find a way to heal the wounds we have opened up in the Middle East. Someone who has courage, not because it is politically expedient, but because it is made necessary by the nature of our times.

Al Gore should run. And he should do so with abandon. Imagine for a second, a candidate who didn't care what the blowhard TV pundits said about him every night. A candidate who connected with the people and overpowered the media. A candidate who has always been right, no matter what they said about him. And who has the courage of his convictions based on the weight of history, not based on the advice of political consultants.

A candidate who didn't care what happened politically because he cares so much about what's right for the country.

Imagine.

The Young Turks

< Random thoughts from the state of the union speech | Bush's Health Insurance proposal >
 Display:
Well if Gore is ready to take on the Millennium Development Goals then I say all the more power to him.  We need a president who is dedicated to more than just party politics and other silly things- we need someone who is going to achieve the end to world hunger (which by the way only costs $19 billion according to the Borgen Project).

by Katie on 01/25/2007 01:23:54 PM EST


but the decision is up to him.

if he did he would have tremendous problems solving any global warming problem ,

seeing as though the Bush administration has already spent enough money that we didnt have to begin with

the debt would first have to be resolved

Bush has already spent enough money to purchase and install solar units on every home in the united states , which would have

reduced our dependence on foreign oil by as much as 20% for the next 20-25 years,

doing that would have given thousands of people new jobs , and would probably have created a new industry for the U.S.

instead he wants a war that will last 20-30 years and will kill thousands of americans

bush has also spent enough money to buy everyone in the country gasoline for a year!

his goal for 20% reduction over 10 years is not just stupid but, well down right crazy seeing as though that could have been accomplished in less than 7 years if he had made the right choices from the start





by mattinohio on 01/26/2007 07:32:12 AM EST


has been brought out of the closet.  Webb has given a "muscularity" to the discussion which adds to Edwards unrelenting passion for ending poverty and championing those who have no voice in government.  If Gore will embrace this as he has global warming, which I'm sure is in his heart, he will be a great ally.  I admire and respect Gore, but most of the time ,as right as they are, Cassandras don't win.  They bum us out.  Pessimism of the intellect must be trumped by the optimism of pushing against the night. Bill Moyers has called on us to tell a new and yet old story of America.  If we don' t throw off our plantation chains, we won't be able to do squat about global warming.  Take action. There are hundreds of people taking an energy day of action tomorrow with as simple things as passing our low watt florescent bulbs. There is the march against the war. Join a small or large group.  The leaders we are waiting for are us.  We can't wait until the election.
 

by LadyDi on 01/26/2007 08:13:02 AM EST


Not only would I see him having an uphill fight, but I think he has shown that he is more useful to us in his current role than he has been as a politician. Not only was Gore an ineffective candidate, but he was also a pretty lackluster senator. He is also way too religious for my tastes. He stands for many good things, but there is no way he would get my primary vote. He would, of course, get my general election vote. My first choice is Wes Clark, followed by Edwards, but as I have written elsewhere, Hillary would serve us well. And I won't vote for either of my first choices in the primary if there is a risk that Obama will get the nod as a result.

by Heretic on 01/26/2007 02:35:39 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Edwards could give Gore the lock on the youth vote he needs, as well as credibility with labor unions and the south.

by jarett on 01/26/2007 09:45:09 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Eventually the Democrat Party primary process will cough up a candidate. Between now and Spring 2008, we want to see fighting that will destroy the entire party.

We want the Hillary forces divided from the Obama forces, who are divided from the Gore forces, who are divided from the Edwards forces.

We want one of the losing candidates to form a third party, and run out of spite.

You think you can do this for us?

by KenTX on 01/27/2007 01:16:33 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Ken,

The democrats could run a stick and win. They could prop up an old cardboard box on a podium and win. Hell they could probably even run a republican and win. Read my lips, landslide. You're in a sinking ship Ken, but from most of your posts, you seem to me to be a dirty filthy small minded rodent, so I'm really surprised you haven't jumped yet.

United we stand, divided they fall? Please, what happened to Karl Rove and your eternal republican revolution majority money machine?!? Fell like the house of cards it was.

I will bet you even money that a democrat wins in 2008 without knowing who is running. I'd even put the odds at 10 to 1. Eventually the republicans will make a comeback, by 2010, at the local government level, with real leadership and honest commitment to oversight and accountability, when they clean out all the  corrupt, selfish, greedy, good ol' boys and return to their core values. But man, that dirty money and that power, and all that Texas grease that makes the machine run, man that shit is gonna be tougher to quit than a junkie gettin off juice.

Keep an open mind Ken, this here tent might even be big enough for your small mind.

by tiggerporn on 01/27/2007 04:36:52 AM EST

[ Parent ]
“I will bet you even money that a democrat wins in 2008 without knowing who is running.”

This is exactly the kind of debate I would expect from a guy who posts pictures of himself holding his dick on his website.

Here is the guy that tiggerporn is promoting for the 2008 Democrat nomination.
teddy


Republicans always settle on a candidate very early in the process. We don’t like surprises. Here is the 2008 GOP ticket.
mccain
powell 

So how will Democrats label McCain and Powell?

Chickenhawks?

Wimps?

Far Right Wing Reactionaries?

Lacking In Gravitas?

Lacking In Intelligence?

Inexperienced?

Not Capable Of Leading?

Unable To Appeal To Moderates?

So who will Democrats nominate to crush the McCain/Powell ticket?

Hillary Clinton?

John Edwards?

Barack Hussein Obama?

Jean Francois Kerri’?

by KenTX on 01/27/2007 05:15:26 PM EST

[ Parent ]

Ive been wondering what Powell will do.

He's been subtly...well..maybe not so subtly...distancing himself from Bush's Iraq policy for so time now. Anyway..his wife apparently is dead set against him running...for anything. She reportedly has some , justifiable I would say, concerns for his saftey if he runs...

I really dont think McCain will hold up for the long run. Dunno why ...just something about his demeanor...

 

by MRFred on 01/27/2007 11:07:33 PM EST

[ Parent ]
So, what you're saying is, "The longer he runs, de meaner he gets?"

by MedfordTim on 01/27/2007 11:34:35 PM EST

[ Parent ]

MRFred slaps his forehead......You should be so funny...oy!

by MRFred on 01/27/2007 11:37:44 PM EST

[ Parent ]
My track record is pretty good. In my most recent prognostication, I predicted Florida would beat Ohio State.

Now I am predicting Al Gore will be the 2008 Democrat Party nominee. Actually, I have been predicting this outcome for quite some time.

Don't bet against KenTX.

by KenTX on 01/28/2007 11:14:14 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Mark my words.

by jarett on 01/29/2007 02:30:46 AM EST

[ Parent ]
I agree that could be a potentially powerful ticket, however i can see some problems with it. 

First off i'm not sure if Powell can ever live down these words:

"mobile production facilities used to make biological agents"

I think he is just too tied to Bush and Iraq at this point to ever be a serious candidate again. 

As for McCain, i'm not sure he will be able to sucessfully suck up to the Radical Right enough to get the nomination without pissing off everyone in the middle.  I just think he'll fall off the tight rope he's walking or at least get hopelessly tangled within it before the race is over. 

by alphasigmookie on 01/29/2007 12:27:23 PM EST

[ Parent ]
but we WILL unite behind whoever comes out of the primary process, no matter who it is.  If Obama wins, he'll probably ask someone like Clark to be his VP for balance.  If Hillary wins, she'll probably ask Obama.  If Edwards wins, he'll probably ask Clark or Hillary, though Hillary would never take second fiddle to a kid like Edwards.

And we'll all be happy with the outcome.  Sorry to rain on your parade, chum.

by jarett on 01/29/2007 02:26:43 AM EST

[ Parent ]

The American people after 8 years of war mongers and war profiteers, chaos and corruption,  are not going to elect a guy that has never got over Vietnam and will pander to anybody to get elected and a guy who covered up the Mai Lai massacre and covered up this adminstration's lies and presented a pack of lies to the U.N.  You can show all the pictures of a young brash pilot, who got shot down by the way, all you want.  I lived through Vietnam and I don't want to relive it once again in the elections.  We need to move on and solve this country's economic problems.  And not by creating jobs in the  bomb making industries or constructing homes for mega millionaires.  We need vision, not old used up ideas on  and old creepy wrinkled face.   McCain is the picture of Dorian Gray right in front of our faces.

by LadyDi on 01/29/2007 08:35:32 AM EST

[ Parent ]
"We need vision, not old used up ideas on and old, creepy, wrinkled face." creepy and wrinkled

by KenTX on 01/29/2007 04:55:20 PM EST

[ Parent ]
"We need vision, not old used up ideas on and old, creepy, wrinkled face."

I agree too!!!!!

by Left Is Right on 01/29/2007 07:02:23 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Clark is so liberal he's practically progressive, isn't that old and (sadly, most importantly) is a good-looking guy:

http://securingamerica.com/ taxonomy/term/31

What is your problem with him?  How did he "cover up the Bush administration's lies?"

by jarett on 01/29/2007 07:42:22 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Whoever gets the Big P slot would be very wise to consider Bill Richardson as a running mate...

by MedfordTim on 01/29/2007 08:56:30 PM EST

[ Parent ]
but theres no way he or enough voters would survive a 700 day onslaught by the corporate media and right wing wackos and still carry thru with a majority vote.

by thbbbt on 01/26/2007 08:40:53 AM EST


maybe you've hinted on his strategy...letting everyone else speculate on him running and beg him to run and then reluctantly accept only months before the primary.  That way it doesn't give the oposition long enough to attack him sufficiently and he can ride a wave of popularity to the nomination. 

by alphasigmookie on 01/26/2007 11:27:12 AM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: