The Washington Bubble

Google Technorati del.icio.us digg reddit
George W. Bush has finally caught Richard Milhous Nixon. It was a historic race but Bush has finally caught him from behind. George Bush now stands at a 24% approval rating in the latest Zogby poll. That is the same approval rating that Richard Nixon had the day he walked out of the White House in shame.

This president is deeply, consistently and historically unpopular. Yet, we still can't break through to the Washington bubble. The country can't stand this president. They think he is incompetent, uncaring and dangerous. Meanwhile, Congress and the DC media elite still think the best solution is to move toward the president rather than away from him.

This boggles the imagination. How can the Senate Democrats decide today to strike a deal with the president to give the telecommunication companies retroactive immunity for the laws that they have broken? How can they possibly think that agreeing with a president at 24% approval rating is a good idea? Let alone, necessary. Necessary? Are you kidding me?

Meanwhile in the House, Democrats backed down from tougher FISA legislation because Republicans wanted to vote on an amendment saying that disagreeing with the president on this issue meant you were giving into Osama bin Laden. Literally. They wrote that into the amendment. Have you seen anything so politically craven and pathetically obvious?

And this actually worked. It stopped the Democrats in their tracks. You knuckleheads, why don't you write an amendment back that says, "Giving away American citizens' liberties and rights is exactly what Osama bin Laden wants most of all, so anyone who votes against our bill loves Osama!"

If they're going to be children about this, hit them back with what I learned in third grade, "I am rubber, you are glue. Whatever you say bounces off of me and sticks to you."

Come on, please don't tell me that you're still scared of these guys. The Republicans in Congress are running for the hills. They can't leave Congress fast enough. Seventeen Republican Congressmen and Senators are hightailing out of town before they get their ass handed to them in the next election. Hastert indicated today that he doesn't even have the stomach to stay for the rest of his term (and that's saying a lot).

And Bush is at 24%. 24%! He is polling as the most unpopular president of all time. He's caught Nixon as Nixon was heading out the door. They should be having hearings on how to throw the bum out of office, not on how to cave in to him. Do you have any common sense at all?

Meanwhile, David Broder and David Ignatius are still writing columns about what a great idea it would be for the Democrats to compromise with the president. The deans of the decrepit, useless DC media tell us that the best answer to the country's great frustration is to go closer to the president, not farther away. Are they nuts?

The middle of this country does not lie between Dick Cheney and Hillary Clinton. The DC establishment is obsessed with civility and neutrality to the point that they are paralyzed into subservience. And they disguise that subservience as so-called moderation.

Meeting Dick Cheney and George Bush halfway is not moderation, it is madness. It is radicalism. It is deeply unpopular. It is terrible politics and terrible policy.

You can't argue that the halfway point between George H. W. Bush and the Democratic Congress of 1990 is the same place as the halfway point between George W. Bush and the Democratic Congress of 2006. The middle of the two parties is not always the right answer! It depends on context, it depends on the situation, it depends on where the parties lie at the time. But you need a brain to figure that out, not a slavish, thoughtless adherence to "neutrality" and "centrism."

I am a centrist. I lie between the George H.W. Bush administration and the 1990 Congress. At this point, that place in the political spectrum is way to the left of the current Democratic party. And it's miles away from George W. Bush. You've already gone so far right, you're about to fall off the map. The American people are trying to warn you. And the Washington bubble keeps on insisting on going further right.  

When is this bubble going to burst? When are the people in charge of this country going to realize they have run this ship aground and the American people are frustrated and furious? If 24% doesn't do it, what will? Does the president have to be at 11%? 3%?

What will it take to wake up Washington? Stop following this man. Stop caving in to him. Stop listening to his silly threats. Stop moving toward him. Start moving away from him as soon as you possibly can. The American people are waiting, in the real center of the country.

Watch The Young Turks Here

< MORE THAN A CRYING SHAME | War in Iraq FOREVER! >
 Display:

He's at 36% on Rasmussen daily tracking right now, and he's been around there or slightly higher this month. Zogby polls are known for being incredibly biased and in 2004 in the days before the election he was predicting a John Kerry landslide. He even predicted Kerry had this one wrapped up when the other pollsters were saying too close to call or advantage Bush.

 

by acroso on 10/18/2007 04:18:16 PM EST


Anytime the polls show something a right-winger doesn't like, they're biased.  Anytime the media reports something that makes the republicans look bad, they're biased.  If a movie criticizes the administration, it's biased.  If the Nobel prize goes to Gore, it's biased (but not when it goes to Kissinger).

You're singing the same song republicans have been singing for years, acroso, but it's getting old and shrill and nobody's buying it anymore. 

by bfaul on 10/18/2007 04:59:17 PM EST

[ Parent ]
It's John Zogby for crying out loud. That's like Rush Limbaugh taking a poll. OF COURSE we're not going to believe that crap.

by acroso on 10/18/2007 06:36:37 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Albert Einstein made D's also.

by ThebigE on 10/18/2007 08:17:50 PM EST

[ Parent ]

Bush made a C- average.

The whole theory is screwed. 

by z1p101 on 10/18/2007 09:02:51 PM EST

[ Parent ]

And btw- the Nobel Peace prize is nothing more than a lib back stratch tool at this point when Arafat and Gore got it for terrorizing the world.

Gore got a D in natural sciences at Harvard, and then he teaches the world what he couldn't do himself. 

by acroso on 10/18/2007 06:55:40 PM EST

[ Parent ]

You are right.

Bush is wildly popular. 

by z1p101 on 10/18/2007 07:03:18 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Did you even go to school?

--- Truth To Power

by Leeberal on 10/18/2007 07:11:02 PM EST

[ Parent ]

"And btw- the Nobel Peace prize is nothing more than a lib back stratch tool at this point"

Well of course it is, Gore won it.  You're determined to prove my point, aren't you?

Gore got his information from all those "liberal" climate scientists.  Their liberal satellites keep recording all that liberal arctic ice receding.  The liberal polar bears keep drowning.  The liberal eskimos keep complaining about permafrost melt and thunderstorms and late liberal caribou migrations.  The liberal sensors on Mauna Kea in Hawaii keep recording higher and higher readings of liberal CO2.  The liberal glaciers keep melting further and further back toward the liberal mountains.  The liberal hurricanes keep getting more powerful.  The liberal water sources keep drying up and the liberal forest fires keep burning the liberal California and Nevada forests.

What's a a republican to do in such a liberally infested world? 

I never thought I'd see the day when conservatives would take a political stand against physics.

by bfaul on 10/18/2007 07:51:11 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Isn't it interesting that  yet again you cant think for yourself. Every single thing you ever post is from the r,ight wing echo chamber.  The right wingers have been trying to discredit zogby for a while now. Its nothing new and I'm not surprised that you tried to parrot it here.


Let me put it in a way that you can understand
Bu$h sucks. The entire world knows it, and it doesnt matter what El Rusho or Bill Crystal or Hanity say about it . They repeat the talking points they get every morning over and over and over. It isnt working this time. Can you exlplain Why? Ill wait till you go to Town Hall or  Free Republic so you can memorize a response.

--- Truth To Power

by Leeberal on 10/18/2007 07:21:58 PM EST

[ Parent ]

Zogby has discredited hiimself in the last 4 election cycles as he predicts Dem landslides everytime.


by acroso on 10/19/2007 02:14:47 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Conservatives try to discredit zogby you mean. What you are posting came directly from a conservative websight. I dont need to "prove " it. You do

--- Truth To Power

by Leeberal on 10/19/2007 02:32:50 AM EST

[ Parent ]

In 2004, however, his predictions failed to materialize. Before polls had even closed in the 2004 presidential election, Zogby predicted a comfortable win for John Kerry (311 electoral votes, versus 213 for Bush, with 14 too close to call), saying that "Bush had this election lost a long time ago," adding that voters wanted a change and would vote for "any candidate who was not Bush." While admitting that he was mistaken, Zogby did not admit any possible flaws in his poll methods, insisting that his predictions were all "within the margin of error." While on The Daily Show With Jon Stewart, he said he felt that Kerry would win due to the undecided voters. Despite his personal prediction, Zogby's final poll showed Bush with a one point lead over Kerry, making him one of the 'winners' among pollsters according to the New York Post and Boston Globe.[1] Zogby later released a "mea culpa" in which he stated "I will do better next time: I will just poll, not predict." [2]

 

link 

 

I also recall Zogby beating the drum for the Dems in 2002 when they got smoked. In 2006 he was predicting something like 55 seat pic-up and he was a good 20 over. We've watched him become a rabid partisan who mixes personal bias with his polling. 

by acroso on 10/19/2007 02:44:59 AM EST

[ Parent ]
btw  Wikipedia is bull shit anyone can write anything. I dont trust it as a source of information.  Did you watch or listen to The Young Turks?

--- Truth To Power

by Leeberal on 10/19/2007 02:37:03 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I watch but not 3 hours normally.

by acroso on 10/19/2007 11:45:51 PM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: