how to usurp the FU presidency?

Email Print posted by DrD 02/15/2007 07:46:41 AM EST

Google Technorati del.icio.us digg reddit

    So what works? Is it massive letter writing? Phoning Congressmen/women and Senators?                   
 

    This is disgusting. Bill Clinton got a bj in office and he was impeached. This presidency is screwing the entire country and he's given a pass.     Bush needs to be called on his own words.     

He said he would fire anyone who outed a CIA agent. The Libby trial showed that at least 4-5 administration officicals outed a Plame and that Cheney knew about it.  The Dems need to pounce?  I have never seen more arrogance than Bush flat out saying "I'm not going to talk about it" when questioned in his press conference yesterday. He needs to talk about it. He needs to talk about every single lie he's ever told and the list just keeps getting longer and longer

< DNC Should Establish A New Task Force On Republican Smear | Credit Where Credit is Due, Blame Where Blame is Due >
 Display:
how to usurp the FU presidency? | 10 comments (10 topical, 0 hidden)
heheheheheheheheheheheheheh (none / 0)

by MRFred on 02/16/2007 07:41:18 PM EST

yet.. (none / 0)
Yet...the Democrats are passing resolutions against our troops, and this does not bother you in the least.

by acroso on 02/16/2007 09:31:43 PM EST

enough.. (none / 0)

by mrscience on 02/17/2007 02:25:16 AM EST

[ Parent ]
repugs are anti troops (none / 0)
The old Dems are anti troop if they are anti war analogy just doesn't hold water. It never did. Its something the repugs toss out when they are in trouble and cant find a way out of it

The repugs want our  troops dying in the middle of a civil war for political reasons that have nothing to do with the safety of this country and sent troops into battle without body armor. Repugs are anti troops!
 
Obama should never have apologized for his comments. Bush did waste the lives of American troops . Iraq is not a threat to America and it never was.

by Left Is Right on 02/17/2007 04:06:13 AM EST

[ Parent ]
defeat (none / 0)
So you support the troops by advocating their defeat?

by acroso on 02/17/2007 04:55:41 AM EST

[ Parent ]
I support the troops (none / 0)
I support the troops by getting them out of the middle of a civil war.

The repugs want to put more troops in harms way for political reasons when they know more troops is not going to solve anything since it hasnt worked the 3 times it has been tried before. 

So if I where to choose which was really more "pro troops" I would of course have to go with the Dems

by Left Is Right on 02/17/2007 10:02:48 AM EST

[ Parent ]
political reasons (none / 0)
political reasons....like winning the war on terror.

by acroso on 02/17/2007 02:15:03 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Where? (none / 0)
Where is the war on terror?  Iraq is a civil war according to Bush.

by Left Is Right on 02/17/2007 05:27:02 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Iraq (none / 0)
There are many Al Qaeda, Hezbos, radical Islamc groups, and Iranians in Iraq who are all terrorists groups who want to force U.S. surrender and who support the Democrat platform of U.S. defeat.

by acroso on 02/17/2007 06:08:28 PM EST

[ Parent ]
You must have missed this (none / 0)

I posted some genuine questions for you last time you talked so passionately about the war on terror.  I assume you missed the post.  Here it is again. I don't think most of us understand so please help us so we can continue this discussion.

by ProfRich on 02/18/2007 12:30:27 AM EST

[ Parent ]
how to usurp the FU presidency? | 10 comments (10 topical, 0 hidden)
 Display: