Jill Is Pulling an Imus--Now What?

Jill's breezy recitation of anti-Semitic canards is akin to Imus' recent comments, except it's worse.

Okay, so Jill's back, and right away she's making anti-Semitic statements. By her arguments, Jews are good at finance, so what's wrong with that? Setting aside the empirical nonsense of that statement (what about a particular monotheistic faith leads to financial acumen?), if there would be any truth to it, it would be as true as the fact that some African-Americans' hair can be described as "nappy".
Sound familiar?
Here's the reality for Jill's benefit: Judaism is a religion, not a race with genetic characteristics. Here's more reality: that canard has been used to persecute Jews for literally two thousand years, from the stories of evil Jewish moneylenders and Judas sellling out Jesus for pieces of silver in the New Testament on forward.
Any time one ascribes a cultural "characteristic" to a national, ethnic or religious group without some rational cause for that characteristic (e.g. demonstrable genetics or laws), whether or not one feels it to be complimentary, it's wrong and objectionable. It's no different from what Imus did, except that rather than slinging this statement at a small group of athletes, Jill has painted every Jew with this brush.
| < Bush's Day Care | Would chicks dig me over Karl Rove? > |