Fairness Doctrine Sham

Fairness Doctrine is a SHAM

Dictator Hugo Chavez of Venezuela has given a name to his crackdown and silencing of right wing media- he is calling it the "Fairness Doctrine." 

Just some random thoughts on how political correctness has run amuck. Conservatives and patriots are literally being kicked out of our colleges because they deviate from Ward Churchill pre-approved speech, and now Gore is pushing a “fairness doctrine?”

What would the debate over this amnesty bill be if the fairness doctrine were implemented? Do you really want some bureaucrat in Washington monitoring the speech of Americans discussing the loss of sovereignty in America? The mainstream media including all news channels including Fox as well as nearly all newspapers minus the Washington Times have been bleached of free thought by brainwashed J-schoolers enforcing the PC code.

So why is it unjust to enforce our borders? According to EVERY mainstream news channel, enforcing our borders is UNJUST unless you tune into talk radio who says NO. The penalty for coming in illegally is deportation. It's not a $1000 fine, and it's not a penalty of citizenship rewarding.

Soon we'll be living in a balkanized country with a TRILLION people. We will have a million ethnicities, religions, cultures, and languages, and our Universities, as normal, will crush dissent at the loss of a country. The J-schoolers, teachers, and professors will be litmus-tested for career advancement based on the PC code otherwise they simply won't make it. These are the people who teach our kids and give us the news.

 Welcome to the PC nation where you will literally be a skull full of Mush or you'll be punished. Well...there's always Paris Hilton and Lindsey Lohen.

 

 

The world is watching our southern border, as long as they realize that it's open. When we pass a bill that gives people the impression that there are new benefits to be had in the United States, and that's the Senate bill, you will have a stampede for the U.S. border that will overwhelm our border forces. -Duncan Hunter

We don't need new law! We need to enforce existing law! We have 350,000 people who have been ordered deported, and we want MORE laws, more amnesties, more Ted Kennedy schemes to destroy America?

NO 1000 PAGE LA RAZA BILL!

People sense that they are losing the country they grew up in, and I can’t figure out why but the elites of both parties are living in the highest ivory tower ever constructed.

< No news is poor news | Jomentum and Mittmentum >
 Display:
Soon we'll be living in a balkanized country with a TRILLION people.

Acroso, try to get a grip. There are fewer than seven billion people on the whole planet.

by Twba on 05/31/2007 08:52:29 AM EST

Well you’re optimistic. This very slanted line will look much more parabolic after the open borders bill passes.

 

numbers

by acroso on 05/31/2007 09:01:01 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Bush gave Democrats the fiscal responsibility issue by selling out. Now Bush is giving Democrats the national security issue by refusing to secure our borders. When we have such idiotic leadership at the very highest levels of the party, it will come as no surprise when Democrats win in a Reaganesque landslide in 2008. And by 2010 and 2012 they'll have a new army of guest voters, so the American people can't really have a mulligan either. We're on a path to national suicide.

by acroso on 05/31/2007 09:11:58 AM EST

[ Parent ]
We'll still have people trying to come over illegally if we institute a policy of deporting them and/or letting them die out in the desert when they try to come over. Of course, they contribute to our economy by paying taxes and picking our produce among other things. Oh yeah, the hotels we stay in when we go on vacation could be more expensive without the labor they provide by cleaning up after us.  And that's just a sampling of the things they contribute to our country. The immigration issue is one the Republicans use as a wedge issue. They know the bigots will side with them. And documenting workers so that we know who the hell they are and who is staying in our country isn't rewarding them for illegal behavior cause they'll still do it anyway. It's a way to secure our borders by screening who comes into our country. We can't just let them die or continue to waste time and effort to deport them when illegal immigrants will continue to come into our country. Plus, immigrants are usually more liberal. I say usually cause nothing is clear cut or black and white so the idea of keeping immigrants out is another form of political control. So of course the Republicans wouldn't want to let the illegal immigrants have amnesty or a path to becoming rightful citizens.

by Sundancegirl on 05/31/2007 05:44:32 PM EST

We'll still have people trying to come over illegally if we institute a policy of deporting them and/or letting them die out in the desert when they try to come over. Of course, they contribute to our economy by paying taxes and picking our produce among other things. Oh yeah, the hotels we stay in when we go on vacation could be more expensive without the labor they provide by cleaning up after us.  And that's just a sampling of the things they contribute to our country. The immigration issue is one the Republicans use as a wedge issue. They know the bigots will side with them. And documenting workers so that we know who the hell they are and who is staying in our country isn't rewarding them for illegal behavior cause they'll still do it anyway. It's a way to secure our borders by screening who comes into our country. We can't just let them die or continue to waste time and effort to deport them when illegal immigrants will continue to come into our country. Plus, immigrants are usually more liberal. I say usually cause nothing is clear cut or black and white so the idea of keeping immigrants out is another form of political control. So of course the Republicans wouldn't want to let the illegal immigrants have amnesty or a path to becoming rightful citizens.

by Sundancegirl on 05/31/2007 05:45:12 PM EST

The Heritage Foundation reported last week that for every 10 thousand dollars illegals pay in, they take out 30 thousand in government services. And I imagine these same illegals will want retro-active social security money eventually if they get citizenship so then instead of minus 20 thousand we’ll be looking at 30 thousand.

 As for the desert, the only way to prevent that is border fencing in those areas and to deter them from coming to begin with. If we mass this massive amnesty, it will only serve as a reward for running the desert successfully.

by acroso on 05/31/2007 05:51:15 PM EST

[ Parent ]

if Bush would have payed that much attention to getting Osama Bin Laden...oh well.

Dude this PC kick..."j schooler" fetish...and unhealthy compulshion towards exaggeration,  take a page from your hero Rush's book ( and we all know you do) and take a pill.

by MRFred on 05/31/2007 10:20:01 PM EST

How do you plan to deport 12 million people?
I hear rail box cars are the best proven method of transportation. Maybe they can stop along the way so they can take a shower.
boxcar

by Beyondhiv on 06/01/2007 07:13:37 AM EST

Enforce workplace verification along with allowing the social security administration to share stolen S.S. information with law enforcement. If you tie up the jobs no one will come.

 There is also a reason there are more people here than under Clinton. Because Clinton at least did a little lip service towards enforcing the law.....

 

 deportations

by acroso on 06/01/2007 07:37:33 AM EST

[ Parent ]

But it's amazing what you learn when you use other sources of information than just this guy. Isn't it?

Bimbo 

by z1p101 on 06/01/2007 08:50:10 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Liberal Heroes Bill Nelson, John Tester, and Jimm Webb stand opposed to this bill.

by acroso on 06/01/2007 09:48:01 AM EST

Jorge G. Castañeda, Mexico’s foreign minister from 2000 to 2003, wrote an Op Ed, “What Mexico Wants.” in the NYtimes at this site....
http://www.nytimes.com/2007 /06/01/opinion/01castaneda. html

"The current Senate package greatly resembles what President Vicente Fox and I proposed back in 2001, in meetings with President Bush and former Secretary of State Colin Powell."


by acroso on 06/01/2007 04:23:30 PM EST

I saw bush out making speeches today asking congressmen to butch up and vote for the bill despite the fact that most people don't like it. There are so many provisions in that bill that I don't like .

--- Truth To Power

by Leeberal on 06/01/2007 04:27:32 PM EST

[ Parent ]

well...this is a fight that had to be had between the real Republican party and the globalist\economic\corporat e wing of the party.

 

It's pretty obvious who is winning---> the corporate wing is. Yet, according to Rasmussen 26% of the American people like this bill, and among republicans that number is even lower, but I don't know if we can stop the bill even though popular support is clearly on the conservatives side.

Here is a online debate between the Cato institute vs. the Heritage Foundation. 

I think that video pretty much sums up the fiasco. 

by acroso on 06/01/2007 07:12:02 PM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: