--- Truth To Power

"just as sex of any type has always been funny"

Well, given a couple minutes, I can think of a couple kinds of sex that aren't really funny...but you get my point. 

--- Truth To Power

"Especially, when a leftoid like OHK, MrFred, or others use the lable to discredit a politically opposing point of view"

You're right, that WOULD be heinous.  Good thing I've never done it. 

I have posted my views many times over the years; primarily in the forums linked to in my earlier articles. I will be posting them again here. (soon I hope) However, I have learned over the years that many people are "discoverers". They like to come to their own conclusions by thinking for themselves. In fact, I would place myself in that category.

 So, I thought that it would be (both) fun and effective to provide my "non religious based" (and) Constitutionally sound basis for banning elective abortions... by posting a sampling of questions that I have asked of myself... in my personal quest for the truth.... specifically with regard to the questions "when does a person's life and rights begin?" And, whether or not the perceived right to have "elective" abortions are rights which are in fact Constitutionally sound.

 Please answer these questions and share your conclusions with myself and the rest of my readers. (For added depth, I have added questions which get to the basis for several of my other positions, as well) Enjoy!

    My friend ChuzLife and I have assembled a series of questions designed to assist willing participants in their own discovery as to what the non-religious, yet Constitutional basis is... for the opposition to many of the hot button items in the leftist agenda. (namely; elective abortion, gun control, gay marriage)

Its also instructive to note that Chuz never once demanded readers answer the questionnaire. He used the word "share" which means to give part of what one has to somebody else to use or consume. Sharing is generally voluntary. Mandatory sharing has many names robbery,  extortion or as KenTX would say ; taxation.

So exactly which questions did you assemble BorrowBang?

Its also interesting that Chuz never once mentions gun control, gay marriage in the preface to his questionnaire. Not one time. I would think if you collaborated with Chuz for that purpose he would have said something about those subjects . Alas he does  not. Why is that?

Its also obvious you have never read the references Chuz so painstakingly put together...himself.

If so ,you would know what the founders,the appellate courts and SCOTUS  and say about sedition and dissent in the references  linked in Question 1.

That history reflect[s] a broad consensus that the Sedition Act, because of the restraint it imposed upon criticism of government and public officials, was inconsistent with the First Amendment.'' The ''central meaning'' discerned by the Court, quoting Madison's comment that in a republican government ''the censorial power is in the people over the Government, and not in the Government over the people,'' is that ''[t]he right of free public discussion of the stewardship of public officials was thus, in Madison's view, a fundamental principle of the American form of government.''