Uni-Healthcare: Step # 1

What will Universal Healthcare do for Me?

I think there is a first step to get us to universal healthcare that no one has talk about and yet is the ingredient that will get everyone on board.
People opposed to uni-healthcare always talk in terms of how much will this cost? how high will the my taxes go up? But the real question is how does the average person who has insurance recapture the money that is already being spent on their behalf.
I made a brief reference to this in a previous post about what I felt the first for step toward universal healthcare. Which after further research I found out a very similar bill was already in Congress. H.R. 676 is very close to what I was talking about. But there is one aspect to my steps that I thought was unique and I though might deserve a little extra discussion.
There should be changes made in the tax code that give serious tax advantages to companies that pass the saving from the cost of healthcare benefits back to employees as compensation (wages), which is taxed at it's normal rates. Companies are currently paying about five thousand dollars a year for a single employee more then ten thousand for an employee and his or her family.
One fact that there is no debate is that the US spends far more on healthcare then any other nation. So we do not need to think in terms of how much more are we going to spend or how much more will my taxes go up. The question is how do we redirect what is already being spent. If we consider that we're currently spending over 15% of our GDP which is over 13 [T]illion dollars on healthcare, of that a third being profits and administrative cost. There is more then enough room to say to everyone we are going to give you universal healthcare and a raise.
< Why does no one ever point out when something is the right thing to do, but bad politics? | wow. SLOW news weekend, eh? >
 Display:
Taxes are already to how. Let's try to find ways to reduce them.

by acroso on 07/23/2007 06:37:05 PM EST

What a well thought out comment on my post.

by Beyondhiv on 07/24/2007 03:49:33 AM EST

[ Parent ]

That's a very astute comment, acroso.  The fundamental method used to destroy social services, infrastructure, and the quality of life in general, is to give tax breaks to the wealthiest people in society.  This starts a downward cycle towards a society divided into the extremely rich and the poor, where only the rich have access t0 basic services, like healthcare.

This is known as the "neo-liberal race to the bottom." 

Hoever, the fundamental roadblock for getting a univesal, single payer medical system in the US is the Medical Insurance lobby.  30% of medical costs in the United Sates are eaten up by adminstrative costs and profit for these unaccountable, behemoth bureacracies

Overhead in the Canadian system is 3%.  Ten times less.  And believe me, knowing that you are always covered and can go to any doctor you want, makes life a lot less stressful.

 Here's an amazing story from the Randi Rhodes message board, that demonstrates how insanely expensive the US system is, and how humane and well-run the Canadian system is.

*************************

Nancy Pelosi for President in 2007

*************************

by SeattleJoe on 07/25/2007 04:25:35 PM EST

[ Parent ]
This is the link to the story at the Randi Rhodes board.

*************************

Nancy Pelosi for President in 2007

*************************

by SeattleJoe on 07/25/2007 04:31:22 PM EST

[ Parent ]

IDK about that but I think our taxes are still to high. We need to drastically cut social spending in this country.

 

You know dems controlled the entire government in the early 90's and didn't do anything about health care so you can't comeplain only about Rs. 

by acroso on 07/25/2007 08:30:16 PM EST

[ Parent ]

Well, the first thing Hillary did after Bill got elected was to devote herself to trying to get a universal health care plan through congress.  She failed, and then the Democrats lost the congress.

I disagree with you about social spending.  Also infrastructure.  And rolling back the Bush tax cutr and raise tax rates for the upper brackets.

*************************

Nancy Pelosi for President in 2007

*************************

by SeattleJoe on 07/26/2007 02:00:35 AM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: