Democrats Crumble Again

Google Technorati del.icio.us digg reddit
If you like this story, digg it!
Lieberman-Kyl Iran Amendment to pass, House condemns MoveOn

I just got home for a quick lunch and I cannot believe what I have just read. There has to be someone out there who can tell me exactly why the Senate has allowed the Lieberman-Kyl Iran Amendment to pass, and then the House voted to condemn the MoveOn.org ad. I just do not know what the Democrats are thinking and what exactly is going on in their heads. I have watched and heard so many people calling on them to stand up and end the war, and they allow this?  I am at my wits end trying to figure out what was the thinking going on to allow this. If anyone out there can give a legitimate answer to as why they are allowing this garbage to pass when they are in the majority please enlighten me. As of this moment they have me clueless, and I am beginning to lose all hope in them. Where are the Democratic leaders, and more importantly where are their spines?
< Tonia Reiman on Fox - the joke | Regarding Cenk's Comments on Burma >
 Display:
Right where the plutocracy wants them to lead.  Sorry to have to be the one to inform you, but we live in a Fascism-lite nation  that controls both parties through a two-party dictatorship run by a plutocracy that uses the two parties as a shell game to keep the voters confused.

The Republican Party does not live up the the Republican PR about small government, no foreign regime change, free trade, etc, any more than the Democrats live up to their PR. The two parties use their PR organs to divide up the voters and then the leadership of the two parties vote to keep the plutocrats in power and only differ on minor tactics of how to do that. 

For example, the question "should we drill in ANWAR or not?" is  minor tactic to the people who own America.  The Republicans say "sure we should drill and get profit everywhere we can." The Democrats say "if you drill in certain places then the people will grumble and maybe become too socialist and nationalize the oil industry so you have to give them some environmental protections to keep them pacified." That becomes the big shell game that keeps the voters occupied and too confused to see who is making the real decisions. 

For another example, the Democratic Leadership always has been in favor of the War in Iraq and still is, but because the grass roots are not, the Leadership had to shift its PR statements to oppose the war. But the Democratic leadership doesn't want to end the war. They want to "win" as much as Bush does, so they argue over strategy, such as the bogus Biden-Brownback-Boxer amendment, rather than just shutting down the government until the troops are withdrawn.

Now the attack on Iran becomes the way that Democrats can distract from their refusal to stop the Iraq war. Now the Democrats can say we approve of the war on Iran even though we were lied to by Bush on Iraq. Of course they are being lied to on Iran also, but that doesn't matter in the long run. Why. Because the voters live in the United States of Amnesia.  Goering, Hitler, and Bush knew all about this. It's as easy as A,B, C:

A.  "Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger."
  - Hermann Goering, Luftwaffe Commander, From his cell at Nuremberg Trials 1946
  - from Nuremberg Diary by G M Gilbert (Signet, New York, 1947)


B.  "The receptivity of the great masses is very limited, their intelligence is small, but their power of forgetting is enormous. In consequence of these facts, all effective propaganda must be limited to a very few points and must harp on these in slogans until the last member of the public understands what you want him to understand by your slogan. As soon as you sacrifice this slogan and try to be many-sided, the effect will piddle away, for the crowd can neither digest nor retain the material offered. In this way the result is weakened and in the end entirely cancelled out."
     ~ Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, chapter six.

C.   "See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda."
     ~ George W Bush, 5/24/05

 http://wonderwheels.blogspo t.com/2007/09/yes-it-is-f-w ord.html

Gregory

by Gregory Wonderwheel on 09/26/2007 04:11:14 PM EST


Our country has been hijacked by hordes of spineless dingleberries, Republican and Democratic alike with no intention of making this world a better place to live in....

by rev24 on 09/26/2007 06:36:52 PM EST


You couldn't have said it any better.  These so called "Dems & Rebubs" are playing out the same game to keep the war(s) going while their pockets pockets continue to get deeper.  Through B/S rhetoric & diversions, they continue to keep the voters divided, while they funnel billions of dollars from the taxpayers by funding phoney contracts in Iraq, Afghanistan, that are going into offshore accounts. 

 
They also manipulate the oil market by controlling the flow that does or does not come out of Iraq, thus driving the price of oil up %300 since 2001.  The government that's in office now is all about....money.  You don't have a 2 party system anymore, you have a 1 party system putting on a 2 party show for the people to keep them divided.

Think about this for instance;  If they really wanted to end the war in Iraq in a timely manner, then why did they only send 30K more troops?  Why not send 200k more to expedite the progress instead of dragging this out? 

They say over & over again that we can't pull out of Iraq now because all hell would break loose and the enemy would follow us home.  Well how could they follow us home & get into the country, if yet we're suppose to have this great "Homeland Security" program in place they created?  Oh yeah! That's right!  That's another one of those illusionistic programs they created, where $100's of billions of taxpayers dollars are going towards, where they have an amendment that says they don't have to show any accountability of where the funds are being funneled  to.....opps....I meant spent due to national security reasons.

If they really wanted to stop the war, they could checkmate Bush in three ways. (1) They could shut down the government by refusing to fund it for the upcoming year, (2) Only fund the war in increments when benchmarks are met, (3) Over fund the war to increase the size of the military presence by 200K to bring the war to an end sooner, thus bringing the war to an end & have all forces out within the next 12 months.

If Bush would not agree to any of those terms, then it could be brought into the eyes of the American people across the country through the media, how Bush is not supporting the military's efforts and how he & his war contracting firends are not he is not trying to bring this war to an end & create stability in the region.

Game....Set...Match.....End Of Story 

 

 

by BrettJamesonIII on 09/27/2007 08:13:01 AM EST


The Democrats have the power to block supplemental appropriations to keep the war going. But if they end the war, all of the sudden they take ownership and responsibility for the aftermath and consequences.

Conversely, George Bush has the power to seal the border by calling the measure "national security". But if Bush seals the southern border, Mexican-American voters will become outraged, and Jeb Bush (who has a Mexican-American wife) will have a diminished chance of becoming president eight years from now.

by KenTX on 09/27/2007 08:42:37 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Bu$h didn't seem to worry about the consequences of starting the war. 

--- Truth To Power

by Leeberal on 09/27/2007 04:24:31 PM EST

[ Parent ]
They are already responsible.

Who gave the shrub authority to behave like an EMPEROR UNITARY EXECUTIVE, TORTURE ETC without filibustering even ONCE ???

And ignoring Hans Blix Ritter IAEA and the rest of the UN who laughed at Powell DRAWINGS of mobile labs, ALUMINUM TUBES that were ANODIZED, shipments of YELLOW CAKE via OBVIOUS FORGED Niger bills of lading per PLAMEGATE, etc that the UN SECURITY COUNCIL did NOT authorize the use of force on inspection resolution violations that were resolved IN FACT THERE WERE INSPECTORS with 100% ACCESS before the shrub pulled them out, that Durbin KNEW that CURVEBALL was TOTALLY BOGUS etc.

The DEMS are in it up to their NECKS already.

If you think the pubic is STUPID you are correct, but they're not THAT STUPID!!!

by singsing on 09/27/2007 06:28:27 PM EST

[ Parent ]
"But if Bush seals the southern border, Mexican-American voters will become outraged, and Jeb Bush (who has a Mexican-American wife) will have a diminished chance of becoming president eight years from now."

Oh Ken you crack me up. Do you really think that people will forget the last name of the worst president we have ever had in just 8 years? W has broken every disapproval rating record for a president in modern times. It has been 27 years and still no one will vote for a person with the last name Carter. Better yet, lets see people vote for a Nixon.

We have seen the last president Bush for a loooong time.

by z1p101 on 09/28/2007 02:38:57 AM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: