CT Dems not 100% to blame for LIEberman.

If memory serves, Democrats DID vote overhelmingly for Ned Lamont in the midterm election.

However, even more Republicans voted for LIEberman in the same election. The final tally was LIEberman (I, insert laugh here) 50%, Lamont (D) 40%, Schlesinger (R) 10%. Republicans torpedoed their own candidate to elect. LIEberman.

Correct me if I'm wrong but I pretty sure I am.

< Victims of Palin | Deporting U.S. Author >

Poll

Is LIEberman a Douche?
Yes 0%
Hell Yeah 33%
Yes to the nth degree 50%
No (Just Kidding) 16%

Votes: 12
Results | Other Polls
 Display:

al gore is culpable in the rise of the great judas lieberman.

* gore picked this motherfucker as his running mate in 2000.

* gore has, even today, not apologized for this pick or repudiated lieberman's stand on anything.

* gore did not campaign, going door-to-door if needed, for lamont in 2006. instead he bloated up on burgers, and burnt jet fuel flying around the world giving stupid powerpoint presentations cribbed from the work of real scientists.

imagine if you will, the nature of the 2006 senatorial campaign in connecticut if al gore had publically "suspended" his "inconvenient" ranting against global warming and focused all his energies on a single goal---the defeat and humiliation of bushkisser lieberman.

i might have then come to have some respect for the guy. but no, that would be expecting way too much from democratic pussies.

if a professional politician, and a guy who aspired to be president, could not care enough about the senatorial race to try to defeat cocksucker lieberman, why should the voters of connecticut pay any more attention. 

by neo on 10/07/2008 11:50:02 AM EST

Obama actively campaigned to get him elected in 2k6 even after Lieberman lost in the Democratic primaries.  Obama is partially to blame.  Lieberman is a NeoCon snake.  Both Connecticut senators are kind of sketchy.

by s10129107 on 10/07/2008 12:57:28 PM EST

 Display: