11/26/2008 08:45:12 AM EST

One other Note On Heidi Klum and Bill O'Reilly

posted by jrolsen

There was one other argument against Bill O'Reilly and his showing the Heidi Klum video.

Email Print
Google Technorati del.icio.us digg reddit Facebook
I wish Anna had known about this argument, so she could have brought it up during her discussion with Cenk.

Why did Bill O'Reilly show the Heidi Klum video, and not the exact same commercial with Kobe Bryant and three other NBA players in their underwear?

Yes folks, the exact same video was produced for the same video game, but with Kobe in his underwear. So what does that do to Cenk's devil's advocate argument? Is it bad to show Heidi (no) and not Kobe (still no) in their underwear?

< Buccaneer Vs. Pirates | Cenk Should Be Proud >
 Display:
One other Note On Heidi Klum and Bill O'Reilly | 1 comment (1 topical, 0 hidden)
well, um...almost. (none / 0)

ACTUALLY...it was Kobe and three other athletes, not NBA players. In fact it was Kobe, A-Rod (without Madonna), Tony Hawk and Michael Phelps doing Risky Business.

But your point still stands.

http://www.youtube.com/watc h?v=pWt5qGIEb28

check it out for yourself.

 

by dominacus on 11/26/2008 10:00:39 PM EST

One other Note On Heidi Klum and Bill O'Reilly | 1 comment (1 topical, 0 hidden)
 Display: