11/07/2008 12:33:32 AM EST
posted by omardini
http://www.youtube.com/watc h?v=ibsP6XN2dIo
Hopefully this will spell the end to Nader's quixotic quest for the presidency.
Pathetic, to say the least. Progressives have no business supporting him.
SAM: What's new, Normie? NORM: Terrorists, Sam. They've taken over my stomach and they're demanding beer.
YouTube: FOX "Uncle Tom" interview with Nader
Given what Nader was trying to communicate, he nailed it. "Uncle Tom" is exactly the relationship with the military-industrial complex he was trying to convey; it's a perfect analogy. But no one is going to hear the message because of the baggage, and the unique fact that Obama had to be black for the analogy to be such a good fit. The FOX talking head's reaction is exactly what (I expect) 99% of people hearing it are going to take away from it: a racist comment, not a brilliant parsing of words. I think Nader is a very intelligent communicator, but also somewhat naive when he gets out of his experience zone.
And I still think he's a jackass.
now, if you want to make that case about the military industrial complex, you won't get any arguments here, but for Nader to say it in that manner shows that his communication skills are breaking down, or he is not as eloquent as he once was. If it were Eugene Robinson calling him an uncle tom, it would be different, not because it's wrong for non-blacks to use the term uncle tom, but eugene is ACTUALLY in a position where Barack could be an uncle tom to him. Barack could never be an uncle tom to anyone but black america, so black america is technically the group who should decide when barack is "tomming". You can't redefine uncle tom into a context where non-blacks are using the term because then it loses it's frame of reference, and becomes a convoluted metaphor. Obviously i'm not saying white people can't use the word, but to try to make a serious argument based on that will only alienate NADER from blacks, and what good is this if he calls himself trying to DEFEND us?
I'm not trying to disprove you by any means, I'm simply trying to offer a perspective as to why it was stupid for him to say that, and why your wording was 1000% better than Nader's.
Chris
I've gained an image of Nader as well-intentioned but naive, based on some of the things I've heard him propose in past interviews. Sure, they sound spiffy and populist on the surface, but don't scale to a national level (everything being done by national referendum? Please). I think he honestly expected his comment to be seen as a well-meant poke in the ribs--a challenge to take his agenda into consideration, with no clue about the baggage that would overwhelm it.
His ship has surely sailed.
fucking prick
chris
because I knew that it would hurt Nader more than anyone else. It was a dumb political move and I take that for what it is. He thought that the wording was clever but it just just offensive and politically careless.
I think that the question was good. "Is Obama going to sell out?" It a question worth asking, but saying "Uncle Tom" the night when the first African American president was being elected... that was just another blow to his message.