McCain is Cheating On His Wife With a Lobbyist!

Email Print posted by Spencer 02/20/2008 07:37:02 PM EST

Google Technorati del.icio.us digg reddit
Where's the fork?  Cause his ass is done.

Go on.  Discuss...
< A Few Quick Points On Diet Drinks (In Light Of The Recent Scare) | Michelle Obama and the level of public discourse >
 Display:
McCain is Cheating On His Wife With a Lobbyist! | 72 comments (72 topical, 0 hidden)
Down Goes McCain!!!!!!!!!! (none / 0)
that dirty dog.....

by rev24 on 02/20/2008 08:06:13 PM EST

Did you read the article? (none / 0)
Not quite the dirt filled scandal you make it out to be. The problem is his actions in regard to some telcoms that appear to be favors...its way to early to proclaim his political death quite yet.

by MRFred on 02/20/2008 08:21:24 PM EST

[ Parent ]
While you're right (none / 0)
it all depends on how the media (and the McCain camp) handles the issue.

We know all too well that non-issues can quickly sink even the strongest candidates if the media spin is the right and the candidate doesn't do a good job of deflecting criticism and speculation.


I'm not crazy about McCain losing primarily because of a non-issue issue (I only care if it's true and it exposes hypocrisy WRT conservative "values") assuming it goes that way...then again the stakes are so high at this point that I'm willing to overlook it. And hey, this could easily die off in a matter of days, weeks or months.  November Rain is a ways off.

by ihavenobias on 02/20/2008 08:28:22 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I admire your honesty (none / 0)

in saying that you'd overlook the non-issue.  But you're not quite living up to your screen name of "ihavenobias".&nb sp; Sheesh.  ;)

In all honesty, this doesn't seem like that big of a deal (at least not yet).  But the Keating stuff that is laid out pretty well in the article is much more damning as far as I'm concerned 

by Spencer on 02/20/2008 08:34:30 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Where is Ken Starr now that we need him! (none / 0)

Did McCain get laid in return for his influence?  Was Vicki Iseman a high-priced prostitute?

I almost wish that my conscience would allow me to claim that these are legitimate accusations.  But they're pure bullshit, of course, and I am not an immoral, anti-American Republican scumbag.

The most that the (please don't read anything into this word) affair could show is that McCain likes pretty young women and can be persuaded by them.

He's not exactly unique in that regard.  (I refuse to reveal any personal anecdotes.)

by Juarez Traveller on 02/20/2008 10:01:48 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Yeah, if we want personal anecdotes... (none / 0)

We should go back to your post about Ana.  I feel like we were pretty close to getting some (no pun intended*) on that one.

 

*It was intended. 

by Spencer on 02/20/2008 10:11:51 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Ouch! (none / 0)

Waitaminitplease while I stop laughing :)

I feel obligated to point out that you are probably too young to know what to do with it even if you did get some.

by Juarez Traveller on 02/20/2008 10:26:37 PM EST

[ Parent ]
HA! (none / 0)

I'll just leave it at that.  Very nice.

by Spencer on 02/20/2008 10:38:12 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Yes I read the article (none / 0)
And I know McCain is lying, hypocritical piece of shit on virtually all fronts.... Don't forget he left his former wife who took of his children when he was POW only to get a nice new piece of ass (Cindy)... Classy!

Now on to the article:

"Convinced the relationship had become romantic, some of his top advisers intervened to protect the candidate from himself — instructing staff members to block the woman’s access, privately warning her away and repeatedly confronting him, several people involved in the campaign said on the condition of anonymity."

You're telling me he was screwing her? 

by rev24 on 02/20/2008 08:49:39 PM EST

[ Parent ]
No (none / 0)

by MRFred on 02/20/2008 11:04:01 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Scandalous! (none / 0)
"Not quite the dirt filled scandal you make it out to be."

I read the article Mr Fred, and this is what I learned.

Eight years ago, Paxson Communications was a campaign contributor to John McCain.

John McCain wrote two letters to the FCC on behalf of Paxson Communications.

Not that any of this was illegal, but I never realized this kind of quid pro quo existed in our nation's capital. I am shocked! I am appalled!

Adultry? Both parties deny it, but at his age, I would be impressed if he could somehow make it happen.

I don't remember this story even slowing the stride of Bill Clinton, and Gennifer certainly never denied it.

by KenTX on 02/20/2008 10:49:38 PM EST

[ Parent ]
No one gives a rats ass about (none / 0)

Bill Clinton...or..based on the primary results, Hillary either.

Nice spin but its not a simple matter of "writing letters" as you make it out to be, particularly for a man who has made lobbists and campaign reform a signature issue nor does it speak well of his " experience " and judgment.

I must say I am disappointed and not in a political sense as you might expect.

 

 

by MRFred on 02/20/2008 11:02:09 PM EST

[ Parent ]
You're disappointed? (none / 0)
Fred, your opinion on this issue matters to me. (I'm not kidding.) You're a moderate centrist who remains impartial in the 2008 election. The rest of us are a bunch of partisan hacks, and our point of view is anything but objective.

John McCain took campaign contributions from a corporation, and he helped them in return. There was definitely quid pro quo. None of those actions were illegal. These things happen every day. Republicans and Democrats. Corporations contribute to politicians, and they expect access and consideration and favors in return.

This was John McCain of McCain-Feingold fame. Nothing illegal happened. Nothing immoral happened. (as far as anyone will ever know)

Was this a case of hypocrisy? You are the best guy in the forum to make the call. 

by KenTX on 02/20/2008 11:27:26 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Legal vrs Ethical (none / 0)

If you've ever had the misfortune of sitting thru an ethics course you would hear the distinction made over and over.

McCain claimed to be a reformer, he claimed to be an independent thinker and he claims to be free of influence. He said he learned a lesson based on the Keating affair and that he learned the error of his ways.

Now this. The NYT, call them what you will, has been working this story for several months, McCain hired a criminal lawyer to try and stop the story and by several reports personally attempted to suppress the story in the NYT. These are confirmed by numerous sources what the campaign says not withstanding.

Even if nothing illegal took place, it calls into question his judgment and the voracity of his positions.

No matter what you may think appearances are important, a 63 year old man ( at the time) spending a great deal of time with an extremely attractive young woman would and did raise eyebrows and give the appearance of impropriety.

It is human nature to think that, particularly in view of the fact that he divorced his first wife and married a woman 11 years his junior. Examples in the lives of normal people abound. I know it, you know it, and a possible future President of the United States should know it.

Add the fact that she was a lobbyist for a large corporation under the oversight of his committee working on legislation that would ultimately be favorable to them ( the company) reinforces that view. His staff recognized this and intervened. They said they often have to do this to" protect McCain" from himself.

Do we need a president that needs this kind of "supervision?" Who will protect us from his impluses?

So in conclusion, perception is reality, Republicans have been using that concept for years in their campaigning..its called swift boating. Please spare me more Clinton stories...this is exactly the same view I had of Clinton.

 

by MRFred on 02/21/2008 08:58:37 AM EST

[ Parent ]
For the record, (none / 0)
11 years isn't THAT big a deal.  Hell, I currently have the hots for a Domer 9 years my junior.  :D

by jarett on 02/22/2008 02:55:09 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Never said it was (none / 0)

just shows a patern of behavior. Domer? in what sense?

1.ND student or 

2. A girl that gives great head to all the homies.. but isnt a slut

3. A bowl of ganja that is for one person, whether it be from a bong or a pipe. Smoke it all in one hit or a few hits, depending on the size of the bowl and your lungs. It goes straight to the dome.


by MRFred on 02/22/2008 08:37:35 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Damn you, Ken. (none / 0)

I watched that whole damned video for nothing.  There's nothing in it.  Not a damned thing.  It's just a fluff piece promoting Flowers' singing career.

But I should have known that it would be a waste of time when you once again inserted Bill Clinton into a discussion in a way that is totally irrelevant.

I have got to stop reading your time-wasting posts.

by Juarez Traveller on 02/20/2008 11:37:42 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Ken (none / 0)

just googles and links. He rarely reads what he links to so it is usually worth while to take a look at it.

However, when it is a you tube link it is usually some propaganda BS that can be ignored.

Hey Ken, show us that video of the Kurds thanking America one more time. 

by z1p101 on 02/20/2008 11:56:53 PM EST

[ Parent ]
It was an IQ test. (none / 0)
"I watched that whole damned video for nothing."

And as usual, you failed.

by KenTX on 02/21/2008 12:48:55 AM EST

[ Parent ]
I see. (none / 0)
You lie and call it an IQ test.

That just mean't you're a creep, doesn't it?

by Juarez Traveller on 02/21/2008 10:08:55 AM EST

[ Parent ]
snort (none / 0)

"Adultry? Both parties deny it, but at his age, I would be impressed if he could somehow make it happen."

That demonstrates the difference in Kentx's mind between Democrats committing adultery and Repubs committing adultry.  If you're a Democrat you're a "rapist and sexual predator", if you're a Republican then you get the benefit of the doubt, and if you did cheat, you're "impressive".&nbs p; What a master of rationalization.

Fox Business News has information on handy devices that might be useful to Cindy McCain to do some investigations of her own in the event of possible transgressions.  Thank god for FOX News, they're always on top of the important stories!

by bfaul on 02/21/2008 09:29:12 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Ew (none / 1)
Honestly, who in their right mind can imagine waking up next to any of these guys? You know they probably never talk during sex, just breathe hard and perspire and then smirk. And then there's all the cologne. Eech.

by Verified1 on 02/20/2008 10:18:38 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Too bad he didn't marry her (none / 0)

Personally, I’m sorry it didn’t work out for McCain and lobbyist Vicki Iseman, age 40. 

Can you imagine the ads we could run if McCain had an “Iseman Trophy Wife”?

by Dogger on 02/20/2008 08:37:54 PM EST

Insert rim shot here. (none / 0)
Ba boom boom tsschhhh.

by z1p101 on 02/20/2008 09:12:53 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I'm way to slow. (none / 0)
That was hilarious.  I just got it now.

by Spencer on 02/20/2008 10:12:58 PM EST

[ Parent ]
WHO WOULD WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH MCCAIN??? (none / 0)
Man, I have heard of (and done) some sick shit in my life, but my god, who the Hell would fuck John McCain??

I can see someone fucking Bush, maybe. Cheney, Maybe. Hillary, Well... BUT JOHN MCCAIN??? Thats just fucking nasty...

This wont be the end of him this time, but it is fun to watch. we shall see how the spin machine works its lies to make this a GOOD thing for McCain ("Those commie bastards over at the NYT dont like me, so I must be conservative!!!" future quote of the McCain Camp)

EEEEWWWW Thats an image I wont soon forget. John McCain doin the nasty on a plane (with a 40 year old, No less!!!)


by bobo1 on 02/20/2008 09:19:34 PM EST

"Cheney, Maybe" (none / 0)

Well, a long time ago I read an article in Hustler magazine (so you know it's true) about Project Monarch.  Basically it's a CIA sex slave operation for powerful people, and it's fucking insane.  But according to the lady in the article Cheney is pretty hung, so make sure you factor that in to your calculation.

But seriously, the picture they had at the top of the article initially (they've since changed it) made McCain look like a total geek.  I was wondering the same thing.  The craziest part is that both of the women he's been with recently (I haven't seen his first wife) have actually been somewhat kind of sort of dare I say attractive (if that's enough qualifiers for you). Power sure does do some amazing things.

by Spencer on 02/20/2008 09:34:02 PM EST

[ Parent ]
To want sex with Igor McCain... (none / 0)
he would have to be hung like a Clydesdale...

Power Corrupts,  but if you want to fuck John Mccain, you ought to be shot. Period.

Thanks...

by bobo1 on 02/20/2008 09:38:00 PM EST

[ Parent ]
A new thought for you, Spencer... (none / 0)
hey, as I sit here and think about it more, doesnt this whole McCain thing smell very Clintonesque? Carvillesque? Whoever is running her campaignesque?

If the media shifts focus from Obama to McCain following some wild goose Clintonesque adultery story, doesnt that take the fuel away from the cult status (and more importantly free media) that is being devoted to Obama?

If I were Obamas people, i would be very careful here...Any derailment of their "message" or popularity could swing the pendulum away from him and onto hillary...

Doesn't it seem a bit too convienent the whole timing of this? And its the NYT, big Hillary supporters...

What are your thoughts, people?

by bobo1 on 02/20/2008 09:46:38 PM EST

Not buying it (none / 0)

We all know the media's history of sticking with any Republican scandals.  This will, like all the others before it, go by the wayside soon.  If the Clintons planned it (which I don't believe), then they must have internal poll numbers that are even worse than the media's numbers to pull a crazy ass stunt like this.  Put a fork in McCain and put a few prongs in Hillary as well.  Both of them are quite done.

by Spencer on 02/20/2008 09:57:11 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I Don't Know, dude... (none / 0)
The more I watch and read about it, something smells funny. even if the story itself is total BS, the point of fact remains....

Clinton IS on her last legs. Texas and Ohio are slipping away, Florida and Michigan are unresolved, and the momentum for Obama is HUGE!!! I couldn't think of anyone better than the Clintons and their buddies at the NYT to pull and push some shit like this to deflect attention away from Obama. Look at the attention it has received tonight...Olbermann's having an orgasm under that desk, and I can just imagine what Dirty Old Drugbag Rush will say tomorrow to the zombies that are the dittoheads...

I dont agree that they are both "done", and they are gonna have to come up with some new strategies against the rising "Messiah" that is Barack Obama. There is still a fight here, and its going to be uglier than ole Janet Reno in her bikini...

Put nothing past a Clinton (or a Republican)

:) Smile

by bobo1 on 02/20/2008 10:18:16 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I emailed Dave (none / 0)
and you are barred from posting at TYT.  He agreed that writing "smile" next to a smiley face emoticon was gratuitous.

;)

by ihavenobias on 02/20/2008 10:40:25 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Hilarious (none / 0)

Everybody has been very funny recently.  It's only a matter of time before some people come along to "not get it" and ruin all our fun.  Enjoy it while it lasts.

But I think bobo is pretty new to this whole "internets" thing, so I'll let it slide.  ... Once...

by Spencer on 02/20/2008 10:51:52 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Thanks!! (none / 0)
It would probably be better to turn me off anyway...I get so pissy sometimes when Im on here...:)

Thats why I love different user names - You never know who I really am :O

I might just be Ken TX in disguise. :{

Nahh, I aint that smart (according to Juarez, Im already an outright fraud) ;(

How about too many emoticons on one post? :>

OK, I'm Done... :D


by bobo1 on 02/20/2008 10:53:18 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Notice that bobo and KenTX (none / 0)
always post at the same time.

All of the logging in and logging out is a hassle. 

by KenTX on 02/20/2008 10:58:15 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Actually... (none / 0)
switching IDs is easy with 2 computers - Who said im new to the here ole "internets"!

;)

by bobo1 on 02/20/2008 11:02:15 PM EST

[ Parent ]
You've said that before actually (none / 0)
Or at least that blogging is new to you.  I remember something like that anyway.  Ask Ken to pull the quote.  He's good at that.

by Spencer on 02/20/2008 11:05:13 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Does that really work? (none / 0)
The CMS should notice posts from two different users coming from the same IP and stop it.

Or does it just go by cookies?

by jarett on 02/22/2008 02:53:34 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Well (none / 0)
Now I really am wondering.  Pretty shady if it's true Ken.  Pretty shady indeed...

by Spencer on 02/20/2008 11:03:31 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Don't worry Spencer. (none / 0)
"Pretty shady if it's true Ken."

We consider you "our" friend.

by KenTX on 02/21/2008 12:40:33 AM EST

[ Parent ]
You want a challenge? (none / 0)
Try arguing with yourself in a blog sometime.

It's very difficult for me to yell at bobo, and then run upstairs to my other computer and yell at KenTX.

by KenTX on 02/21/2008 12:46:25 AM EST

[ Parent ]
That would imply that you guys argue. (none / 0)
Is the honeymoon over?

by Spencer on 02/21/2008 12:53:44 AM EST

[ Parent ]
I argue with everybody. (none / 0)
That's why I'm here. If I wanted to agree, I would go to Free Republic.

bobo is a moderate centrist who votes Democrat.

KenTX is a moderate centrist who votes Republican.

That makes us close in political ideaology.

by KenTX on 02/21/2008 12:59:56 AM EST

[ Parent ]
rotflmao (none / 0)

Dude, you are a neo con.

Who are you trying to bull shit. 

by z1p101 on 02/21/2008 03:11:18 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Me apparently (none / 0)

Don't you know?  He's a "liberal republican" as he said himself.  He only cares about two conservative issues: Tax cuts, and killing terrorists.  Yet he's a member of the Minutemen, and I don't know a whole lot of "liberals" who really give a shit about the border (at least not enough to "guard" it for any amount of time). 

Oh Ken.  Don't try to be moderate now just because your neocon ways are going out of style.  Hold firm to your beliefs and march proudly into irrelevance.

by Spencer on 02/21/2008 04:19:25 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Yo I'll solve it (none / 0)
Have one of those motorized stairway chairs installed like Mrs. Deagle has in Gremlins.  That will reduce the wear and tear on your joints...and I hear they hardly ever malfunction.

by OneHitKill on 02/21/2008 05:32:02 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Good Reference n/t (none / 0)

by ihavenobias on 02/21/2008 11:02:15 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Wow. Whaddya know. (none / 0)

KenTX/bobo1 absolutely fooled me.  I believed they/he/she/it were/was who they/he/she/it said they/he/she/it were/was.  I took them/him/her/it at their word -- at least until they/he/she/it outright lied about something, which they/he/she/it did several times.  But it's true that I never suspected that they/he/she/it were the same person.

Was it fun, KenTX/bobo1?  Does deceiving lots of people make you feel good?  Are you happy about what you've done?  Has it increased your self-esteem?

Yes, it certainly is something of which you can be proud.  You have a lot more victims to which you can add to your list of trophies.

So, tell me, what's it like to treat people as objects who exist solely for your amusement?  That's all we are to you, isn't it?  Is it easy living without a conscience and with absolutely no regard for others?

Don't worry.  I don't expect an answer, and I wouldn't expect honesty if you did answer.  I just wanted to say:

Congratulations!  You fooled me.  Well done.  Nice job.

by Juarez Traveller on 02/21/2008 10:34:43 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Here's your answer (none / 0)
I haven't even begun messing with your tiny brain.

You're a punk.

by KenTX on 02/21/2008 06:41:05 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Aww. (none / 0)

Shucks.  bobo1/KenTX, a liar and a fraud, thinks I'm a punk.

Whoopdeedoo.

by Juarez Traveller on 02/21/2008 07:25:30 PM EST

[ Parent ]
smile! (none / 0)
I've been taking it as an instruction rather than a description.

by jarett on 02/20/2008 11:22:42 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Ha! (none / 0)
But that makes his conservative posts even more devious because ":) Smile" is like a spoonful of sugar helping the medicine go down.  But in this case the medicine is some sort of flesh eating bacteria.

by Spencer on 02/20/2008 11:40:01 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I couldn't wait (none / 0)

I knew this was coming and I decided not to wait for the trifecta. What will Rush say? The same thing you and Ken are saying.

It's all Clinton's fault.

You are taking the "it must be another Clinton dirty trick" approach.

Ken is using the old faithful "Clinton did too" strategy.

All that is missing now is the "Clinton invented the adultering politician" so it is his fault angle.

I saw this coming a mile away.

by z1p101 on 02/20/2008 11:08:28 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Yo I'll solve this, too (none / 0)
Only problem is -- SHUCK, DAMN -- Bill Clinton's not around to be voted against in this election.  How ever will Ken vent his moral outrage?  Looks like voting against that dirty scoundrel McCain is his only recourse.

by OneHitKill on 02/21/2008 05:34:12 AM EST

[ Parent ]
meh (none / 0)
Who cares... nobody who would vote for McCain cares that the guy is screwing a lobbyist... that's par for the course for the Repubs. 

by schmoab on 02/21/2008 01:46:51 AM EST

Agreed (none / 0)
That's exactly my take on it.  They'll all be scratching their heads and saying "What's all the fuss about?" to each other.

by bfaul on 02/21/2008 09:34:46 AM EST

[ Parent ]
I meant to add... (none / 0)
...they'll then erupt in moral outrage at the New York Times for "sliming" McCain.  Checkout Fox News, that's the way they reported it of course.

by bfaul on 02/21/2008 09:36:34 AM EST

[ Parent ]
What would you call it? (none / 0)
"They'll then erupt in moral outrage at the New York Times for "sliming" McCain."

1. No crime: Accepting contributions from and doing favors for corporate interests is done by McCain and Feingold and every freakin politician in DC.

2. No sources: Who saw John consumate the act of adultry?

If this is not a "sliming", then what would you call it?

by KenTX on 02/21/2008 06:46:37 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I think Rove's behind it (none / 0)
This smells like one of his tricks, and we all know how his people feel about McCain.

Getting a liberal rag like the NYT to do his dirty work probably made the deal all the sweeter.

SAM: What's new, Normie?
NORM: Terrorists, Sam. They've taken over my stomach and they're demanding beer.

by Spinny on 02/21/2008 06:50:22 PM EST

[ Parent ]
DAMN you guys are getting smarter! (none / 0)
"Getting a liberal rag like the NYT to do his dirty work probably made the deal all the sweeter."

The NYT puts out a hit piece on McCain, timed to "define" him during his debut as the nominee, and this is all they can come up with?

Old John McCain might have got himself a young piece of strange a few years ago. BFD!!

Either the New York Times is in league with the McCain campaign, or they have become the laughing stock of journalism.

by KenTX on 02/21/2008 07:13:27 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Never ceases to amaze. (none / 0)
"Old John McCain might have got himself a young piece of strange a few years ago. BFD!!"
It's okay to throw away millions of taxpayer dollars to figure out the exact details of Clinton's infidelity, but McCain does it and BFD.  Your hypocrisy blows me away (pun of course intended).

by Spencer on 02/21/2008 07:28:14 PM EST

[ Parent ]
But that is KenTX/bobo1's purpose here. (none / 0)

KenTX/bobo1, and whoever else s/he may be here, has only one goal: to deceive us for his or her own entertainment.  Principles don't matter.  Honesty, loyalty, none of it is important to him or her.  No other person has any importance or any impact on KenTX/bobo1.  That's what it is to be a sociopath.

It's all about us being entertainment for him or her.

KenTX/bobo1 is a very mentally unhealthy person.

by Juarez Traveller on 02/21/2008 07:36:12 PM EST

[ Parent ]
"Juarez Traveler" is a phony nic (none / 0)
I have an admission to make to the entire forum. I’m a complete phony.

I have posted in this forum under numerous nics and User Ids such as Chinese Democracy, Tiny Demon, Leeberal, malaria, Left Is Right, Stay Tuned, Juarez Traveler, Hungry Jack, Grave Dancer, Bill Ding, just to name a few. If you want to see what I’m talking about, just plug any of these names into the comments search bar, using the “comments by” option.

Here are a few facts about myself:

1. I claim to be a TYT member, but it’s not true.

2. I keep changing my nic because my goals are disingenuous and evil.

3. My objective is to disrupt the forum, and I’ve been doing this for a couple of years.

4. I can’t stand when pseudo-progressives are polite to conservative trolls.

by Juarez Traveler on 02/21/2008 10:45:33 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Honesty, at long last. (none / 0)
Thank you for your admission. I guess this gives you two options with repect to your participation in this forum.

1. Become a courteous and friendly and polite forum participant.

2. If you are unable to post in a polite manner, expect to be banned.

by KenTX on 02/21/2008 11:12:20 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Brilliant Device, bobo1/KenTX (none / 0)

Mis-spelling my name so that you could create a phoney ID and impersonate me.

You continue to demonstrate your truly dishonest nature.

by Juarez Traveller on 02/22/2008 12:21:50 AM EST

[ Parent ]
unsustainable persona (none / 0)
In the long run, you will never be able to sustain a persona of anger, hatred and vitriol.

Other participants will not tolerate it, because we get tired of reading it.

Even if your peculiar mental illness allows you to live in such a miserable state, it doesn’t give you the right to burden the rest of us with your misbehavior.

by KenTX on 02/22/2008 12:35:43 AM EST

[ Parent ]
I will always fight dishonesty and fraud. (none / 0)

Is there something wrong with that?

by Juarez Traveller on 02/22/2008 01:02:15 AM EST

[ Parent ]
is that so (none / 0)
Is that right ? Then why havent you been banned you insufferable fucking troll?  Hey is that polite enough?

by Chinese Democracy on 02/22/2008 02:13:18 AM EST

[ Parent ]
On second thought, maybe it was Huckleberry (none / 0)
Trying to craft his miracle.  The Lord helps those who help themselves, you know.  Besides, you convinced me: Rove would have crafted a better smear.

SAM: What's new, Normie?
NORM: Terrorists, Sam. They've taken over my stomach and they're demanding beer.

by Spinny on 02/21/2008 07:36:53 PM EST

[ Parent ]
That (none / 0)
would be a good bet. The political arm of the religious right needs a loss in 08. It is a chess game.

by z1p101 on 02/21/2008 07:46:43 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Hell, I'll even pray for his success (none / 0)
The best thing in the world for the country would be the Repugs ending up having to nominate that fundie nut job.  

SAM: What's new, Normie?
NORM: Terrorists, Sam. They've taken over my stomach and they're demanding beer.

by Spinny on 02/21/2008 08:03:43 PM EST

[ Parent ]
What I'd call it (none / 0)
The perfect reason for all of these neocons to line up behind McCain.  Hope you're ready Ken.

by Spencer on 02/21/2008 07:02:05 PM EST

[ Parent ]
McCain is Cheating On His Wife With a Lobbyist! | 72 comments (72 topical, 0 hidden)
 Display: