Maya - Illusion and the Hillary/Obama dynamic

Google Technorati del.icio.us digg reddit
If you like this story, digg it!
What if it was Hillary who had won 11 of the last 11 primaries?  What if it was Hillary raising more money than God?  What if it was Hillary who had the huge rallies and all the momentum?  How do you think Barak would be talked about in the media, or the story that would envelope him?  I think they would have drummed him out of the race by now.

A point that I don’t think gets mentioned often, if at all.   One of the big issues people have with the government is the constant feeling that we are not told what is going on.  We are not kept informed.   The reason this is a problem is that for a democracy to work, it depends on an INFORMED public.  The ‘governing’ can make it work for themselves and their friends by keeping us out of the loop.

This is how we got into this unwise and illegal war.  The mental image I have is a picture of the US from a satellite and some big, shadowy wizard or sorceress floating above the east coast and spinning the wand in circles.  Colored waves of smoke or mist fan out over the country and envelope the whole nation.  This is like the illusion they create.  They manipulate the story, the sell it to the media and project a whole different reality into the consciousness of the country.   Suddenly, Saddam attacked us and we have to invade and anyone who says anything else is a traitor, etc.

We are all familiar with the tactic, the Republican spin machine weaving its story of fear and causing events to go their way.

It occurred to me from a couple of observations others have mentioned, that we are witnessing the same thing in this primary race. 

First, if you took every instance where the Clinton campaign talked about women and this historic opportunity for women, etc.  and tried to replace that with Obama and his campaign saying the exact same thing switching the word ‘women’ to ‘Afro-Americans&rsquo ;.  How do you think that would play out?  Not a pleasant thing to contemplate.  Doesn’t this suggest a different standard?  I can’t imagine Barak complaining about how unfair he has been treated as a Black man, like Hillary tries to keep the women aware of her situation as ’poor Hillary’, all those mean men.

And yet, everyone seems to be convinced that the media is so unfair to her.  And the super delegates should not move away because that would be unfair to her too.  Everyone is so unfair to her, such a raw deal.  But think about this.  What if it was Hillary who had won 11 of the last 11 primaries?  What if it was Hillary raising more money than God?  What if it was Hillary who had the huge rallies and all the momentum?  How do you think Barak would be talked about in the media, or the story that would envelope him?  I think they would have drummed him out of the race by now.  I certainly don’t think they would be so overly ‘fair and balanced’ in his favor. 

And yet, the Clinton campaign keeps everyone stringing along with their vision of what ‘could be’, what is ‘only fair’, how we should see this whole thing.   Look at the realities and look at the perception.  They have done a fantastic job of bamboozling everyone.

And that is why I feel uncomfortable.  Rather than ‘winning’ on facts, they have chosen the tactic of ‘managing the perceptions’. &n bsp; That is exactly the philosophy of the current administration, managing perception.  Not dealing with the issues, not actually solving the problems, but manage the perceptions.  Manage perceptions until reality actually catches up, as it always does, and the drunken stupor or the drug induced hallucination, gives way to the new day.  Or the economic realities hit the fan.  What we are all hungry for are people who will talk to us as adults, inform us what is happening and stop trying to manipulate us with managed perceptions of what they want us to think until we all go over the cliff.  That is why we are sick to death of this philosophy and management style.  And it is just what the Bush’s and Clinton’s are doing.

< I am outraged. | Pres. Bush press conference 022808 >
 Display:
Some people see only what they want to.

You for example, no one Obama, Edwards, Dodd, Biden etal were close to Clinton until that Oct. Debate when Russert and Williams gang banged her on national tv (Note: I support Edwards). It got so bad that Richardson refused to play along.

Insofar as the race issue How did the words fairy tale turn into racist code words? Especially considering the Clintons record on race issues? Want to play what ifs? what if whites voted for Clinton at 60, 70, 80% one would suppose that whites were voting for the white candidate and were being racist (that's what happened in NH right?). If you think that Obama has been treated the same as Clinton you are in for a rude awakening.

Did you notice the change in tone just in the last week?


At the end you lump Clinton and Bush together why? They couldn't be further apart. Fact Obama and Hillary are in agreement on almost every issue.

by LORD FOUL on 02/28/2008 04:00:45 PM EST


I've been watching the race from up here in Canada and I've been shocked by the breathtaking nastiness, particularly against Hillary.  Everything she does is viewed through a cynical lens ("Clinton rules"). There are sound reasons to be worried about BOTH Clinton and Obama, from a policy perspective, but it's almost as though the media won't be satisfied until Sen. Clinton is *humiliated*.  Even Cenk seems to be indulging in this lately, which is getting out of hand. The constant laughing and mocking of this woman is not advancing our understanding of substantive issues. It just makes me sad.

GDK 

by godammitkitty on 02/29/2008 04:54:41 AM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: