Should the U.S. Senate recognize the Armenian genocide?

Google Technorati del.icio.us digg reddit
It is a classic. Every year on April 24th, we have to see the same comedy. Armenians get all worked up about the Armenian Genocide and sing their ‘Shame on you, Turkey!’ chants in the streets of L.A.
 

It is a classic. Every year on April 24th, we have to see the same comedy. Armenians get all worked up about the Armenian Genocide and sing their ‘Shame on you, Turkey!’ chants in the streets of L.A.

Why is the U.S. involved in this even when the historians themselves could not agree whether this was a genocide or not? Although it is undeniable fact that hundreds of thousands perished in 1915, we should not forget that just as many Muslims, Turks and Kurds, were massacred by the Armenian militia who sought after taking a chunk of Eastern Anatolia from the Ottoman Empire to establish an independent Armenia (which they eventually did) during the First World War.
 
What about the Turkish consul in Los Angeles who was killed by ASALA (The Armenian Secret Army for the Liberation of Armenia ) terrorists in 1982?


What about countless other diplomats and innocent civilians massacred by these trigger-happy thugs in France, Canada, Greece, Lebanon, Iran, Switzerland, Turkey and Belgium between 1975 and 1987 whose aim was purportedly "to compel the Turkish Government to acknowledge publicly its alleged responsibility for the deaths of 1.5 million Armenians in 1915, pay reparations, and cede territory for an Armenian homeland".?
 
If the U.S. Senate ever recognizes April 24 as a day to commemorate this genocide, we must also recognize the massacre and genocide committed by the Armenians against the Muslim population in Eastern Anatolia as well.
 
Some among the Armenians in the diaspora would never want the Turks to recognize the genocide. If they do so, they’ll pull the rug out from under their feet and take the strongest bond that unites them. The Armenians have been in the habit of savoring the cocoon of victimhood for so long and the U.S. has to carry this foreign hunchback for years now. Both Turks and Armenians have to let bygones be bygones and learn to empathize with each other's pain.

< NIGHTMARE AHEAD | Ben Stein's Expelled >
 Display:

   And what about the Assyrians who were living in Urmia in what was then northern Persia. Ottoman Turks destroyed their villages and murderd thousands. My grandfather lost most of his family. My mother was born in a British refugee camp fleeing the massacre.

    Oh yeah, that's right we had an empire that controlled most of the known world ruthlessly with chariots at the point of a spear. Never mind.

    The roman alphabet is limiting, but here goes. Shlamaluch... yo. Surai!

    
 

by marbelizer on 04/27/2008 07:46:32 PM EST


Every day should commemorate some ugly human slaughter so we can re-inflame nationalism every. single. day.  No thanks.  Let's please focus on the present and the future.  Nationalism be damned.  We need to start remembering we are all humans pretty fresh out of Africa, evolutionarily speaking. 

by desertpear on 04/27/2008 07:53:39 PM EST


What goes through your mind when you hear about Armenians protesting for recognition of the Genocide? Do you think they are asking for a national holiday where everyone takes a day off work to think about the 1.5 million killed? No...the Turkish government denies the genocide ever happened...and in turn, the U.S government has never recognized it, nor cared to do so. What the Armenians want is simple...recognition and a simple statement indicating that the event did indeed happen. Armenians aren't asking for something like black history month. They aren't asking for anything other than recognition that it happened! The Armenian genocide is not published in most history books. The Armenian genocide was an event that the American government brushed under the rug because they have been in bed with the Turkish government for ages...America politically benefits from Turkey...so they screw Armenians in the ass by agreeing NOT to recognize the genocide. Don't be foolish...it wouldn't effect your mundane life anyway whether or not the bill passes. No one would be FORCED to think about the genocide...the bill would simply state the genocide did in fact happen.

No one goes around denying the Holocaust. No one denies whatever terrible thing the Armenians did in the past. But it has always been denied that the Armenian Genocide took place, and that's foolish. It another historical event that the American government hides in light of their precious political allies.

I would love to see the YOUR reaction if someone wrote a blog insisting that we don't recognize the holocaust. You would freak out because that's an incredibly ignorant, careless, and hateful notion. It's something that DID happen in the past and people recognize. So what makes your blog any different? It's just as ignorant and careless.

And before you go around putting Armenians on blast...do your damn research and see what they are asking for. You act as though passing the bill will effect you in some uncalled-for negative way...which is not the case.

by AnaKasparian on 04/27/2008 11:46:58 PM EST


Maybe you should sleep with everyone who significantly advances the cause like that net neutrality chick.

Couldn't hurt.
 

by ProfRich on 04/28/2008 12:31:57 AM EST

[ Parent ]
You will not be on that list.

by desertpear on 04/28/2008 12:45:12 AM EST

[ Parent ]

I am not on that list now (I am not against it, I am just not working overtime to make it happen.) But if we do the Net Neutrality chick plan, now we are having a conversation. 

(Obviously, I am kidding.  I have nothing but respect for AK-47 and figured since her job is to ridicule stuff like the Net chick she can take a joke.) 

And I am not going to LA for any girl and besides that's crazy. Sex? Come on. Look, I'm married. So none of that. That will put me in trouble.

I will point out, if it hasn't been already, when Hitler's advisors asked if killing the Jews was a bad idea because it would bring Germany unwanted enemies, his response was "Nobody cared when the Turks killed the Armenians."  That seems to suggest pretty strongly it was genocide, huh? 

 

by ProfRich on 04/28/2008 12:54:38 AM EST

[ Parent ]

Don't let us yank your chain Ana (remember how Contessa gripes about her song and Jayar keeps playing it?).  Lawmakers seem to have a great deal of trouble labeling certain events as "genocide," just like they can't call what our economy is doing "a recession."  Why is that exactly?  I admit that I am completely ignorant of this part of history, but I still have this gut feeling that this type of thing exacerbates division and nationalistic impulses, and that the list of horrible events humans have done to each other is limitless.  I feel the same about Israel using the Holocaust to justify everything they do.  And I KNOW the Holocaust now--I just finished watching the seven-hour Shoah documentary.

I am open to being educated on how this might help repair relations between these peoples.  Maybe I just don't have any personal experience in something like this.  I have no real knowledge of what my European ancestors went through.  But the whole demonstration thing against Turks sounds wacky to me, and not likely very productive to peace.  Enlighten me!  

by desertpear on 04/28/2008 12:26:24 AM EST


You can raise this subject, but elturcoloco's post oozes insensitivity. I would have loved to delete it, but too many people responded and now I feel I should leave it. But if this stuff starts getting us in trouble, yes, I will censor it. Denounce and reject me all you want.

David

by yturks on 04/28/2008 01:44:10 AM EST


Yes, they should.

by tiggerporn on 04/28/2008 06:35:13 AM EST


Of course Turkey should acknowledge the deaths, but was it genocide? The Armenians were not entirely innocent victims. They had the Russian army behind them.

The history is much more complicated than the 20 ft hot air balloon I see every year in front of the Armenian old folks' home, with a banner saying "1 million Armenians killed by the Turks". There were nearly that many Turks killed too. It was during the last throes of their empire, which was falling apart all around them--a hellish time for all sides. Perhaps when Armenians and Turks can talk about the entire history and can empathize, then both will resolve their ongoing antipathy. After all they're mostly the same people anyway.

Turkey has been a crossroads for thousands of years. Many Turks and Armenians have intermarried. They're separated by religion more than anything--ethnically they are very similar, whether they want to admit it or not (and they don't). Nothing should be forgotten, but both sides can build a safer future by putting the hostilities aside while learning from them.

Blood feuds seem to go on forever, like in a Doonesbury comic earlier this year.

Blood Feud 

 

by zenie on 04/29/2008 12:48:50 AM EST


Your favorite members of the Bush Administration bluntly state that they don't want to admit to the Genocide because it would anger Turkey...and they politically NEED Turkey at this time of war...

Pelosi will perfectly point out whether or not what happened to the Armenians was genocide.

http://youtube.com/watch?v= T3Y96DzaniA&feature=rel ated

by AnaKasparian on 04/29/2008 06:01:07 PM EST


Yes, indeed the Bush administration does not want to say that it was a genocide. Neither did Clinton, Reagan, Kennedy, Roosevelt nor any other president throughout the history.
I am not surprised that Pelosi calls it a genocide as she has a big Armenian-American political base in California and I would definitely expect her or any other Californian politician to endorse it as a genocide if they want to serve another term in the office.  
Let’s call it as it is. When the Nazi killed the Jews during the Holocaust, that was a genocide. When the Janjaweed kills the non-Arab black Sudanese, it is a genocide, because they were and are killed for being who they are, not because of their treason and/or crime they have committed.
Armenians and Turks killed each other in during the WWI and that was mutual massacre and a civil war NOT a genocide. Armenians killed the Turks and Kurds because they wanted to establish a homeland for Armenia with the support of Russia. Thousands of Armenians have perished not only because they were deported to the inner parts of Ottoman Empire, but they were fighting a proxy war against the Ottoman central government in the middle of the empire for the Russians..
Yet, if we ever accept this massacre as ‘genocide’ (not that we should), we must also recognize the massacres committed by the Armenians against the Turks and Kurds during WWI as a genocide .
What is ironic is while Armenians label the massacres they have witnessed a genocide, they conveniently ignore the massacres they have committed in Eastern Anatolia during WWI and Khodjali, Azerbaijan and Nagorno-Karabakh in early 1990s.
Neither we or the U.S. Senate should not use this term so loosely. When 3<sup>rd</sup> parties get politically involved in subjects like this, they tend to use it as an instrument for the advancement of their own political agendas, not to ease the pain suffered by the other parties.

by elturcoloco on 04/30/2008 08:52:02 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Precisely, many Armenians and Turks died during this time while fighting each other in an endless cycle of revenge. The Armenians fired the first shot by creating rebel committees and organizing thousands of volunteers to fight the Ottoman Empire by igniting rebellions in many cities. However, when you do your research you should always keep an open mind, because in society people tend to follow the opinion of what they perceive to be the majority; however, once upon a time we used to believe the earth was flat and research and discoveries proved otherwise and for the last 92 years since the Armenian massacres, evidence has changed to show that the original belief that Armenians were victims of a carefully planned extermination campaign were just exaggerations based on war-time death tolls. People thought that Turkish perspective about the history was simply denial, as the Armenian Genocide advocates would have you believe. Thousands of documents and witnesses are right in front of our eyes that show that while the Armenians did suffer, the Turks suffered greatly as well, and the atrocities were committed by local parties on both sides. We mourn the many Armenians, Turks, Kurds and other Muslims that lost their lives. However, far from it, the events that transpired prior to the collapse of the Ottoman Empire cannot be characterized as a genocide.

by Rufat on 05/07/2008 04:01:14 PM EST


 Display: