Meanwhile--The Dems take ANOTHER seat from GOP

Google Technorati del.icio.us digg reddit
If you like this story, digg it!
The Dems are creeping up on taking over both Houses in DC.

The GOP poured millions into the Mississippi special election and LOST again.

Great job Childers

Oh yeah and Obama won the Nebraska Primary tonite(and had already taken the Caucus in Feb). I guess those White People dont work so hard

Democrats picked up a northern Mississippi House seat in one of the most conservative-minded districts in the country Tuesday night -- an upset  that will reverberate darkly through a House Republican caucus already reeling from losses in special elections in Illinois and Louisiana.

With all precincts reporting, the Democratic nominee, Prentiss County Chancery Clerk Travis Childers, defeated Republican Greg Davis, 54 to 46 percent.  Childers was able to expand his three-point margin of victory from the race's first round of balloting last month -- even as he faced an onslaught of Republican attacks.

The victory marks the Democrats’ third straight special election pickup in three months. It will be a serious blow to the Republican Party’s already-flagging morale and will surely prompt a new round of finger-pointing among the already fractured GOP caucus.

"This loss is going to prompt serious introspection by our conference to figure out what went wrong and how to fix it," said a GOP leadership aide. "We have time to do that, and we will if we learn our lessons leading into November. But the next couple of days are not going to be pretty."

The special election was held to fill the seat of former Rep. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), who was appointed to serve out the remainder of Sen. Trent Lott’s term last December. Wicker had never faced a competitive race since first elected in 1994, and the district gave President Bush 62 percent of the vote in 2004.

The results amount to a rebuke of the Republican strategy of trying nationalize the race by tying Childers to Sen. Barack Obama and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Obama held low approval ratings in the district, but the nearly $2 million that GOP groups poured into northern Mississippi failed to make the race a referendum on the national political landscape.

Republicans dispatched a lineup of heavy hitters in the campaign’s final week, including a pre-election stop Monday by Vice President Dick Cheney. President Bush, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and First Lady Laura Bush recorded automated calls urging voters to support Davis.

A GOP House leadership aide told Politico last week that “if we don’t win in Mississippi, I think you are going to see a lot of people running around here looking for windows to jump out of.”

The $1.27 million that the NRCC spent in the heavily Republican district amounted to nearly 20 percent of the committee's entire cash-on-hand. The committee has now spent more than $3 million to defend three conservative House seats, losing all three of them, and it is ill-equipped financially to compete fully in an ever-widening playing field for November.

For his part, Childers effectively downplayed the national implications of the contest, instead framing the race as a geographic battle between his home base in the 20 largely rural counties in the northeast corner of Mississippi and Davis’ base in the newer and fast-growing Memphis suburbs.

Childers improved upon last month's performance in most of the district’s smaller rural counties and his home county of Prentiss, and he managed to cut slightly into Davis’ margin of victory in his home base around the South Memphis suburbs.

"His victory has sent a political thunderbolt across America tonight," DCCC chairman Chris Van Hollen said in a statement. "It is yet another rejection of the House Republican agenda, the Bush Administration’s misguided policies, and John McCain’s campaign for a third Bush term."

By Josh Kraushaar
< Obama Map | Testamonials from WV >
 Display:
This reminds me of the Great Depression, some of Roosevelt's biggest opposition came from conservative Democrats. I fear that although yes winning these seats in the South will increase the pull of the Democrats, these Democrats are not the same ideologically as those from other parts of the country. I will start another thread on this subject, but for now, I do not want to steal your thunder.

Blog: http://perspectivos.blogspo t.com/

by Nick86 on 05/14/2008 01:23:26 AM EST


I was wrong. That's the third special election in a row.

The GOP better get serious and go to school on these elections.

by KenTX on 05/14/2008 05:42:02 AM EST


The GOP is losing because they "aren't serious", huh?

Maybe they should have taken running the country more seriously. Then people wouldn't hate them so much. 

Ken, what are your predictions?  President?  Senate? House? 

by ProfRich on 05/14/2008 09:51:45 AM EST

[ Parent ]
I predict Democrats will run a far left liberal African American with no experience and a very suspicious background against a moderate and centrist true American hero. In a year when Democrats should win in a landslide, I predict a very close election. If McCain manages to squeek out a victory, I predict hundreds of thousands of Democrats will literally go insane, like Juarez Traveller did in 2004. If McCain loses, I predict massive GOP victories in 2010 and 2012. On the whole, I remain upbeat and optimistic about America. That's why I'm not a liberal.

by KenTX on 05/14/2008 11:21:46 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Thats it in a nutshell - It shall be interesting to see...

:)

by bobo1 on 05/14/2008 11:31:40 AM EST

[ Parent ]
That the American people are fed up with the Republicans screwing up the country and are going to give the Democrats their turn to screw things up.  The voters are smart enough to understand they are essentially voting for a party, and not an individual.  How else could you explain Chimpy getting re-elected?  It's not like anyone liked the guy in 2004--everyone knew what a clown he is.  They elected him because the Republican brand was selling terrorism as the biggest issue in teh world.  Nobody's going to buy that in 2008, unless they can trigger another attack somehow.  Dems have been historically trusted to fix bad economic times.

by schmoab on 05/14/2008 11:56:39 AM EST

[ Parent ]

No, you won't make a prediction about who wins the White House and how many seats will shift what way in the House and Congress.

by ProfRich on 05/14/2008 12:04:05 PM EST

[ Parent ]
"That news is good enough, but we also got great news out of Nebraska, where netroots champion Scott Kleeb crushed all opposition in winning the primary to contest for Chuck Hagel's vacated Senate seat. Sen. Ben Nelson wanted his big business buddy Tony Raimondo to be the candidate, despite the fact that he was a Republican until the day he announced he was a candidate and that the Democrats in the Senate blocked his appointment by Bush to be the manufacturing czar because he closed plants in Nebraska and moved jobs to China."

 

by Chinese Democracy on 05/14/2008 08:55:31 AM EST


"despite the fact that he was a Republican until the day he announced he was a candidate"

Nebraska elections have no party affiliation.  The affiliation only come from the National Parties recognizing and supporting the candidate.  Did the Dem party openly welcome this clown in?  I think there might be some confusion here. 

by ProfRich on 05/14/2008 09:55:05 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Dems are running ultra conservative "Democrats" in southern House races. Some of them are newly converted. Its a smart strategy. We'll see.

by KenTX on 05/14/2008 11:08:45 AM EST

[ Parent ]

First he tells us its a swing state now its a southern state.  So is Illinois apparently.  Maybe they are southern to Nick but not me.

But seriously, I agree that the Dems are running moderate  candidates in conservative districts.  Considering the blue dog caucus is threatening to kill the GI Bill this seems to represent a potential problem for progressives.  But I am a political pragmatist and eviscerating the GOP is priority one.  Herding our kittens to the light comes later.

by ProfRich on 05/14/2008 12:03:05 PM EST

[ Parent ]
These are the first few small rocks preceding the avalanche.

by bfaul on 05/14/2008 09:43:53 AM EST


 Display: